Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Understanding Deception01:14

Understanding Deception

Deception is a pervasive aspect of human communication. Empirical studies have shown that most individuals engage in some form of deceit on a daily basis, with approximately 20% of social exchanges involving deceptive elements. Lying follows a developmental trajectory, peaking during adolescence and declining with age, possibly due to the maturation of cognitive control and social accountability.Cognitive and Social Factors in Deception DetectionDespite its prevalence, accurately detecting...
False Memories01:18

False Memories

False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
First Impression01:09

First Impression

First impressions play a crucial role in social perception, shaping how individuals assess others in professional, academic, and interpersonal contexts. Psychological research highlights the significance of cognitive biases, such as the primacy and recency effects, which influence how people interpret and recall information.The Primacy Effect and Cognitive AnchoringThe primacy effect describes the tendency for initial information to impact judgment disproportionately. When individuals encounter...
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

White matter microstructure of sensorimotor projection fibers in chronic low back pain.

Pain reports·2026
Same author

Cerebellar gray matter alterations in chronic low back pain and their associations with postural control and pain sensitivity.

Pain·2026
Same author

Brain Activation and Functional Connectivity During Performance of Lumbopelvic Motor Tasks in Individuals With and Without Low Back Pain: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same author

Sleep architecture and quality and pain experience in individuals with persistent low back pain and asymptomatic controls.

PloS one·2025
Same author

The Effects of Experimental Sleep Extension in Middle-to-Older-Aged Healthy Sleepers.

Sleep science (Sao Paulo, Brazil)·2024
Same author

Association between seated trunk control and cortical sensorimotor white matter brain changes in patients with chronic low back pain.

PloS one·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

Deception and the misinformation effect: an event-related potential study.

Scott W Meek1, Michelle C Phillips, Corey P Boswell

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina-Upstate, Spartanburg, SC, USA. meeksw@gmail.com

International Journal of Psychophysiology : Official Journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology
|November 28, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study shows that memory uncertainty, like in eyewitness accounts, impacts deception. Both lying and memory uncertainty independently affect cognitive processes, influencing brain activity.

More Related Videos

Employing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Resource Limited Environment to Establish Brain-Behavior Relationships
06:05

Employing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Resource Limited Environment to Establish Brain-Behavior Relationships

Published on: April 20, 2022

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

Employing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Resource Limited Environment to Establish Brain-Behavior Relationships
06:05

Employing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in a Resource Limited Environment to Establish Brain-Behavior Relationships

Published on: April 20, 2022

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners
09:52

How to Find Effects of Stimulus Processing on Event Related Brain Potentials of Close Others when Hyperscanning Partners

Published on: May 31, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Forensic Science

Background:

  • Deception research typically uses familiar information, not reflecting real-world scenarios like eyewitness testimony.
  • Memory uncertainty, common in eyewitness accounts, may influence the ability to deceive.
  • Understanding these factors is crucial for interpreting deception and memory in legal and social contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how memory uncertainty affects the ability to deceive.
  • To examine the neural correlates of deception and misinformation using event-related potentials (ERPs).
  • To differentiate the independent and combined effects of deception and memory uncertainty on cognitive processing.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a visual misinformation paradigm combined with event-related potentials (ERPs).
  • Measured brain activity (ERP components) during deception and misinformation tasks.
  • Analyzed specific ERP components like P3b, N400, and the late positive component (LPC).

Main Results:

  • Deception showed significant parietal P3b suppression and a large frontal negativity (N400).
  • Misinformation also led to parietal P3b suppression and affected the occipital late positive component (LPC).
  • Both deception and memory uncertainty independently influenced information processing, despite potential combined effects.

Conclusions:

  • Deception and memory uncertainty have distinct yet overlapping influences on neural processing.
  • The findings provide insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying deception in the presence of memory uncertainty.
  • This research has implications for understanding eyewitness testimony and the reliability of deceptive accounts.