Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Is There Still a Role for Fibrinolysis in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction?
C El Khoury1, F Sibellas, E Bonnefoy
1Intensive and Coronary Care Unit, Cardio-Vascular University Hospital, 59 Bd Pinel, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, 69008, France.
Modern fibrinolytic strategies, combining immediate treatment with timely percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), offer outcomes comparable to primary PCI for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI). These approaches are crucial when immediate PCI is not feasible.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Emergency Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Fibrinolysis was the standard for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), reducing mortality but carrying risks like cerebral hemorrhage.
- Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) has limitations due to treatment delays, potentially diminishing its benefits compared to fibrinolysis.
- Despite PCI's advantages, fibrinolysis remains relevant in Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the continued role and modern strategies of fibrinolysis in STEMI management.
- To highlight the benefits of combining fibrinolysis with subsequent PCI in specific patient groups and logistical settings.
- To emphasize the importance of regional healthcare networks for optimizing AMI treatment.
Main Methods:
- Review of current treatment paradigms for STEMI, comparing fibrinolysis and primary PCI.
- Analysis of modern fibrinolytic strategies incorporating immediate fibrinolysis, antiplatelet therapy, and planned PCI.
- Discussion of logistical requirements for effective implementation of these strategies, including hub-and-spoke networks.
Main Results:
- Modern fibrinolytic strategies achieve clinical results similar to primary PCI.
- Fibrinolysis is beneficial for patients experiencing delays in accessing primary PCI.
- A subset of patients (under 75 years, treated early, unable to receive immediate PCI) may benefit most from modern fibrinolytic strategies.
Conclusions:
- Fibrinolysis, when integrated into modern treatment protocols, remains a vital option for STEMI.
- Effective regional healthcare networks and standardized protocols are essential for maximizing the benefits of fibrinolysis-based strategies.
- Ongoing quality improvement initiatives and registries are necessary to ensure proper application of these AMI management strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology

