Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Evolution of reperfusion therapies for acute brain and acute myocardial ischemia: a systematic, comparative analysis
Richa D Patel1, Jeffrey L Saver
1UCLA Stroke Center, 710 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Insights
Reperfusion therapies for cardiac ischemia are more advanced and effective than those for brain ischemia. Significant technical advances are needed to improve cerebral blood flow restoration for stroke patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Neurology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Interventional Neurology
Background:
- Early reperfusion is critical for acute brain and cardiac ischemia.
- Cervicocephalic circulation presents unique challenges for recanalization interventions.
- A systematic comparison of historical reperfusion intervention development is lacking.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically compare the historical development and effectiveness of reperfusion interventions for cardiac and cerebral ischemia.
- To analyze trends in reperfusion rates and treatment modalities over time.
Main Methods:
- A Medline search identified multi-arm, controlled trials of coronary revascularization (acute myocardial infarction) and multicenter trials of cerebral revascularization (acute ischemic stroke).
- Trials reporting angiographic reperfusion rates were included.
- Data from 1983-2009 were analyzed, encompassing 37 coronary trials (10,908 patients) and 10 cerebral trials (1,064 patients).
Main Results:
- Endovascular treatments demonstrated higher efficacy in achieving reperfusion compared to peripherally administered fibrinolytics in both circulatory beds.
- Coronary reperfusion rates started high and improved modestly from the 1980s to 2009.
- Cerebral reperfusion rates began lower and increased more slowly; by 2005-2009, cardiac reperfusion rates (partial 86.1%, complete 78.6%) substantially exceeded cerebral rates (partial 61.1%, complete 23.4%).
Conclusions:
- Reperfusion therapies for cerebral ischemia have developed more slowly and remain less effective than for cardiac ischemia.
- Cerebral circulation-specific technical advancements are necessary to match the safety and efficacy of restoring blood flow to the ischemic brain as achieved for the ischemic heart.
Background And Purpose:
Early reperfusion is the most effective therapy for both acute brain and cardiac ischemia. However, the cervicocephalic circulatory bed offers more challenges to recanalization interventions. The historical development of reperfusion interventions has not previously been systematically compared.
Methods:
Medline search identified all multi-arm, controlled trials of coronary revascularization for acute myocardial infarction and multicenter trials of cerebral revascularization for acute ischemic stroke reporting angiographic reperfusion rates.
Results:
Thirty-seven trials of coronary reperfusion enrolled 10 908 patients from 1983 to 2009, and 10 trials of cerebral reperfusion enrolled 1064 patients from 1992 to 2009. Coronary reperfusion trials included 10 of intravenous fibrinolysis alone, 8 combined intravenous fibrinolysis and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with or without stenting, 3 intra-arterial fibrinolysis, and 16 percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with or without stenting. Cerebral reperfusion trials included 1 of intravenous fibrinolysis alone, 3 intra-arterial fibrinolysis, 3 endovascular device alone, and 3 of endovascular treatment ± intravenous fibrinolysis. In both circulatory beds, endovascular treatments were more efficacious at achieving reperfusion than peripherally administered fibrinolytics. In the coronary bed, rates of achieved reperfusion began at high levels in the 1980s and improved modestly over the subsequent 3 decades. In the cerebral bed, reperfusion rates began at modest levels in the early 1990s and increased more slowly. Most recently, in 2005 to 2009, cardiac reperfusion rates substantially exceeded cerebral, partial reperfusion 86.1% versus 61.1%, complete reperfusion 78.6% versus 23.4%.
Conclusions:
Reperfusion therapies developed more slowly and remain less effective for cerebral than cardiac ischemia. Further, cerebral circulation-specific technical advances are required for physicians to become as capable at safely restoring blood flow to the ischemic brain as the ischemic heart.
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care

