Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Optimizing Mouse Urodynamic Techniques for Improved Accuracy
Published on: June 7, 2024
Ambulatory urodynamic studies (UDS) in children using a Bluetooth-enabled device
Aniruddh V Deshpande1, Jonathan C Craig, Patrina H Y Caldwell
1Department of Urology, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia. sushrudh@hotmail.com
Insights
Ambulatory urodynamic studies (UDS) using Bluetooth devices offer valuable insights beyond conventional UDS for children with voiding dysfunction. This method is safe, well-tolerated, and aids in guiding effective therapy.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Urodynamics
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Conventional urodynamic studies (UDS) are essential for diagnosing voiding dysfunction in children.
- Limitations exist in conventional UDS, prompting the exploration of alternative methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present initial findings on ambulatory UDS utilizing a Bluetooth-enabled device in pediatric patients.
- To assess the added diagnostic and therapeutic value of ambulatory UDS compared to conventional UDS.
Main Methods:
- Ambulatory UDS were conducted on children with voiding dysfunction.
- Conventional UDS were performed concurrently when feasible for comparative analysis.
- Results and treatment outcomes from both methods were compared.
Main Results:
- Ambulatory UDS identified detrusor overactivity (DO) in six children where conventional UDS was normal.
- Direct symptom correlation with DO was achieved in two children during ambulatory UDS.
- Therapy guided by ambulatory UDS results led to clinical improvement in five children.
Conclusions:
- Ambulatory UDS provides supplementary information crucial for guiding therapy in pediatric voiding dysfunction.
- The ambulatory approach is deemed safe and well-tolerated in the pediatric population.
- Standardized guidelines are needed for the technical application and interpretation of ambulatory UDS in children.
Objectives:
• To report the early observations of using ambulatory urodynamic studies (UDS) using a Bluetooth-enabled device in children • To evaluate the incremental value of ambulatory over conventional UDS.
Patients And Methods:
• Ambulatory UDS were performed in selected children with voiding dysfunction between August 2009 and October 2010. • Conventional UDS were concurrently performed wherever possible. • The test results and treatment consequences of the two tests were compared.
Results:
• In all, 12 ambulatory and seven conventional UDS were performed on 10 children (five boys, median [range] age 7 [4-16] years). • Six of the seven children had a normal conventional UDS. Ambulatory UDS detected phasic detrusor overactivity (DO) in five children and generalised DO in one. • Direct correlation of symptoms to DO was possible in two children during ambulatory UDS. Pressure rise during filling, seen in two children on conventional UDS, was not seen during ambulatory UDS. • Five children showed clinical improvement when therapy was guided by ambulatory UDS results. • Ambulatory UDS was generally well tolerated in eight children, with two complaining of discomfort. Inadequate information was obtained in two children who underwent ambulatory UDS due to technical problems in one and distress induced by the UDS in the other.
Conclusions:
• Ambulatory UDS provides useful additional information over conventional UDS and can be used to guide further therapy in selected children with voiding dysfunction. • It is safe and well tolerated in children. • There is a need for explicit guidance for the technical delivery and interpretation of ambulatory UDS in children.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Imaging Studies VI: Voiding Cystourethrography and Cystography
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies

