Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Microbiological Rapid On-Site Evaluation for Pulmonary Infectious Diseases
Published on: March 1, 2024
Evaluation of a rapid test for the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia
R Monno1, L Fumarola, G Mercadante
1Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Policlinico, p.zza G. Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy. rosa.monno@uniba.it
Abstract:
We evaluated the usefulness of a rapid immunochromatographic pneumococcal urinary antigen test (UAT) for the diagnosis of pneumonia over a period of five years. The UAT was positive in 32 (2.3%) urine samples obtained from 1414 patients. In 46 of these 1414 patients results of UAT and/or sputum/pleural fluid culture and/or blood culture and/or procalcitonin levels were available and therefore the study was concentrated on these patients. A concordance between UAT positivity and the presence of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the sputum was observed in only 4 of 46 (8.7%) patients for which both urine and sputum samples were analyzed. A discordant result (UAT positive and absence of S. pneumoniae in sputum samples) was recorded in 8 of 46 (17.4 %) patients. UAT negative results with sputum culture positive for S. pneumoniae were recorded in 28.3% of patients. In 20 patients, UAT tested positive but sputum culture was not performed. A concordance between UAT positivity and the isolation of S. pneumoniae from blood was seen in 2 of 46 patients whereas a discordant result (UAT positive and blood culture negative) was seen in 12 (26.1%) patients. A concordance between the UAT and high levels (≥2ng/ml) of procalcitonin was observed in 4 out of 46 patients, whereas a positive UAT result and a procalcitonin negative result were observed in 2 patients. In our experience the UAT allows the detection of the etiological agent of pneumonia, and also when sputum and/or blood cultures are negative for S. pneumoniae, when the clinical picture is suggestive of alveolar pneumonia.
Insights
The rapid pneumococcal urinary antigen test (UAT) shows limited concordance with sputum or blood cultures for diagnosing pneumonia. However, UAT can detect Streptococcus pneumoniae when other diagnostic methods are negative, aiding clinical diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Diagnostics
Background:
- Pneumonia diagnosis relies on various methods, including cultures and biomarkers.
- Rapid diagnostic tests can improve clinical decision-making for pneumonia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical utility of a rapid immunochromatographic pneumococcal urinary antigen test (UAT) for pneumonia diagnosis.
- To assess the concordance of UAT results with sputum/blood cultures and procalcitonin levels.
Main Methods:
- A five-year retrospective study involving 1414 patients with suspected pneumonia.
- Analysis of pneumococcal urinary antigen test (UAT) results.
- Comparison of UAT findings with sputum culture, blood culture, and procalcitonin levels in a subset of 46 patients.
Main Results:
- UAT was positive in 2.3% of patients.
- Low concordance was observed between UAT and sputum culture (8.7%) or blood culture (4.3%).
- Discordant results were frequent, with UAT positive/culture negative cases observed.
Conclusions:
- The pneumococcal urinary antigen test (UAT) has limited specificity when compared to traditional culture methods.
- UAT may detect Streptococcus pneumoniae in pneumonia cases where cultures are negative.
- UAT can be a useful adjunct diagnostic tool when clinical suspicion for pneumonia is high.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Atypical Pneumonia
Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
Sputum Studies II: Culture and Sensitivity
Sputum culture and sensitivity is a medical procedure used to diagnose bacterial infections in the respiratory tract and select the most appropriate antibiotics for treatment. This process involves analyzing sputum samples of thick and opaque secretions produced in the lungs and airways. These samples are collected from patients and then sent to the laboratory for analysis.
The test can identify various pathogens responsible for respiratory infections, including Streptococcus,...

