Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
Quantitative Analysis01:12

Quantitative Analysis

Quantitative analysis is a technique for measuring the amount of specific constituents in a sample. When the sample's composition is unknown, qualitative analysis is performed first to identify its components, which ensures that the correct substances are measured during the quantitative phase.
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the method...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Qualitative Analysis01:10

Qualitative Analysis

Qualitative analysis is the process of identifying elements, ions, or compounds in an unknown sample. It is the first and most fundamental type of analysis based on the hierarchy of analytical goals. This hierarchy is significant as it provides a structured approach to scientific research, with qualitative analysis serving as the initial step, providing essential information before moving on to quantitative or other forms of analysis.
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Qualitative Analysis03:46

Qualitative Analysis

For solutions containing mixtures of different cations, the identity of each cation can be determined by qualitative analysis. This technique involves a series of selective precipitations with different chemical reagents, each reaction producing a characteristic precipitate for a specific group of cations. Metal ions within a group are further separated by varying the pH, heating the mixture to redissolve a precipitate, or adding other reagents to form complex ions.
For instance, group IV...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline Amendment (2026).

The Journal of urology·2026
Same author

Utility of PSMA PET/CT After an Initial Negative Scan: Results from a Prospective Multicenter PSMA PET Registry.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·2026
Same author

Validation of the safety, empathy and utility of a large language model conversation agent for parents of autistic and neurodivergent children.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Mediation analysis of adherence to pelvic floor muscle training and weekly self-monitoring on urinary symptoms in men with localized prostate cancer: A secondary analysis of the Prostate Cancer-Patient Empowerment Program (PC-PEP) randomized controlled trial.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada·2026
Same author

Zen and the Art of Clinical Research.

Practical radiation oncology·2026
Same author

New prostate cancer risk groups by PSMA-PET (PPP3): an international, retrospective, registry-based cohort study.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same journal

Retrospective Review Is the Best View: A Primer for Residents and Radiologists on Missed Findings in Chest Radiography.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Special Issue on Sustainability.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Empty Versus Full Bladder Protocols in Radiotherapy Planning for Localised Prostate Cancer: A Dosimetric Study.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Re: Paediatric Varicocele Embolisation: Clinical Experience, Insights and Long Term Clinical Outcomes Over 14 Years at a Tertiary Centre-A Cohort Study.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

Comment on Baseline Haemoglobin Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Treated With Yttrium-90 Radioembolisation: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 136 Patients.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2026
Same journal

A Single Institution Retrospective Review of Pancreatic Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Outcomes.

Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Categorizing segmentation quality using a quantitative quality assurance algorithm.

George Rodrigues1, Alexander Louie, Gregory Videtic

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Western Ontario and Lawson Health Research Institute, Canada. george.rodrigues@lhsc.on.ca

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
|December 6, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new quality assurance (QA) method to improve contouring consistency in radiotherapy. The novel approach quantitatively assesses contour accuracy against expert consensus, enhancing treatment precision.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Image Analysis

Background:

  • Contouring consistency is crucial for optimizing the therapeutic ratio in radiotherapy.
  • Current quality assurance (QA) methods for contouring accuracy are limited.
  • A novel quantitative methodology is needed for evaluating contour compliance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a quantitative methodology for the quality assurance (QA) of contour compliance.
  • To establish a benchmark for contour accuracy using a community of expert physicians.
  • To assess the performance of new observers against established consensus contours.

Main Methods:

  • Two clinical scenarios (lung and prostate cancer) were used with a QA algorithm.
  • Multiple physicians created reference contours, and a consensus contour was generated using Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE).
  • Contouring Penalty Metric (PM) scores quantified differences between individual and consensus contours.

Main Results:

  • The QA system identified 16 outlier contours in the lung cases, primarily due to over-contouring or missing/incorrect nodal contours.
  • In the prostate case, the QA system detected issues such as missing structures and systematic contouring errors.
  • The methodology effectively quantified contour discrepancies for new observers.

Conclusions:

  • A practical and quantitative methodology for contour quality assurance has been demonstrated.
  • This approach has potential applications in clinical trial credentialing and medical education.
  • The methodology can be used for assessing auto-contouring algorithms.