Related Experiment Videos
Colposcopy of patients with cytologic inflammatory epithelial changes
L E Frisch1, H Parmar, L D Buckley
1Student Health Service, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale.
Acta Cytologica
|March 1, 1990
Summary
Cervical screening with inflammatory epithelial changes (IECs) found human papillomavirus (HPV) or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in 8.5% to 23.5% of cases. Colposcopy may detect CIN missed by cytology, but further research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Gynecology
- Pathology
- Oncology
Background:
- Cervical cytology screening is crucial for early detection of cervical abnormalities.
- Inflammatory epithelial changes (IECs) on cervical cytology can obscure underlying significant pathology.
- The diagnostic yield of colposcopy following an IEC diagnosis requires further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the utility of colposcopy in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in women with a cytologic diagnosis of IEC.
- To determine the prevalence of HPV or CIN among women with IEC who undergo colposcopy and biopsy.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective review of 3,308 cervical cytologies performed between September 1986 and September 1987.
- Colposcopy was offered to 371 patients with IEC; 200 underwent the procedure.
- Histologic analysis of biopsies from patients with atypical transformation zones.
Main Results:
- Of 200 women with IEC who underwent colposcopy, 44 had an atypical transformation zone.
- Biopsies from 33 women revealed diagnoses including HPV infection (4 cases) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) (4 cases), with most showing CIN I.
- The 95% confidence interval for detecting HPV or CIN in women with IEC was 8.5% to 23.5%.
Conclusions:
- Colposcopic examination following an IEC cytologic diagnosis may identify cases of CIN that are missed by standard screening.
- The potential for colposcopy to improve detection rates for significant cervical pathology warrants consideration.
- Further studies are necessary to address potential biases from false-positive histology reports before widespread recommendation.