Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
Published on: July 29, 2022
Comparison of co-expression measures: mutual information, correlation, and model based indices
Lin Song1, Peter Langfelder, Steve Horvath
1Human Genetics, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, California, Los Angeles, USA.
Robust correlation measures, particularly biweight midcorrelation, outperform mutual information (MI) for gene co-expression network analysis. Topological overlap transformation enhances biologically meaningful modules, suggesting correlation networks can replace MI for stationary data.
Area of Science:
- Bioinformatics
- Computational Biology
- Systems Biology
Background:
- Gene co-expression networks are crucial for understanding gene function and regulation.
- Mutual Information (MI) is a common metric for inferring gene-gene relationships, but its added value over correlation is unclear.
- Identifying biologically meaningful gene modules requires assessing co-expression measures and data transformations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comprehensively compare Mutual Information (MI) with various correlation measures for gene co-expression network construction.
- To evaluate the impact of different adjacency matrix transformations, such as topological overlap, on module quality.
- To explore alternative methods for capturing non-linear relationships beyond MI.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of MI and robust correlation measures (e.g., biweight midcorrelation) across eight empirical datasets and simulations.
- Assessment of topological overlap measure and other transformations on adjacency matrices.
- Evaluation of gene ontology enrichment for modules derived from different co-expression measures.
Main Results:
- A strong linear relationship exists between MI and correlation for most gene pairs, indicating MI offers limited advantage in stationary data.
- Biweight midcorrelation, transformed by topological overlap, yields superior gene ontology-enriched co-expression modules compared to MI and Maximal Information Coefficient (MIC).
- Polynomial or spline regression models are proposed as effective alternatives to MI for non-linear relationships.
Conclusions:
- Biweight midcorrelation is a more effective measure than MI for gene pairwise relationships.
- Topological overlap transformation combined with biweight midcorrelation significantly improves co-expression module enrichment.
- Correlation-based networks are a viable and often preferable alternative to MI networks for stationary co-expression data.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coefficient of Correlation
If you suspect a linear relationship between x and y, then r can measure how strong the linear relationship is.
What the VALUE of r tells us:
The value of r is always between –1 and +1: –1 ≤ r ≤ 1.
The size of the correlation r indicates the strength of the linear...
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Correlations
Correlation of Experimental Data
For example, a spherical particle moving through a viscous fluid experiences drag. Dimensional analysis shows that the drag force depends on the particle's diameter, velocity, and...
Calculating and Interpreting the Linear Correlation Coefficient
Correlation and Regression

