Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom02:45

The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom

Shortly after de Broglie published his ideas that the electron in a hydrogen atom could be better thought of as being a circular standing wave instead of a particle moving in quantized circular orbits, Erwin Schrödinger extended de Broglie’s work by deriving what is now known as the Schrödinger equation. When Schrödinger applied his equation to hydrogen-like atoms, he was able to reproduce Bohr’s expression for the energy and, thus, the Rydberg formula governing hydrogen spectra. Schrödinger...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Minimal universal quantum heat machine.

Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics·2013
Same author

Quantum bath refrigeration towards absolute zero: challenging the unattainability principle.

Physical review letters·2012
Same author

Disordered Markovian Brownian ratchets.

Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics·2002
Same author

[Rare manifestation in infectious mononucleosis with reference to the morphological characteristics of hemo-, myelo- and lymphadenograms].

Przeglad lekarski·1951
Same journal

Topological properties of curved spacetime extended Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

Influence of lattice expansion on Cr ferromagnetism in Ce<sub>(1-x)</sub>La<sub>(x)</sub>CrGe<sub>3</sub>compounds revealed by atomic-scale measurements.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

Bond-length-driven magnetic transition in quasi-one-dimensional CrSb<i>X</i><sub>3</sub>(<i>X</i>=S, Se).

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

Anelasticity in MgAl2O4 spinel due to cation order-disorder.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

The influence of water on the dynamics of alternating polymers P(C<sub>8</sub>EG<sub>4</sub>) and P(C<sub>4</sub>EG<sub>4</sub>) by broadband dielectric spectroscopy.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
Same journal

How surface curvature shapes water nanodroplets in air.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

Strong-coupling BCS models of Josephson qubits.

R Alicki1, W Miklaszewski

  • 1Institute of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, University of Gdańsk, Wita Stwosza 57, PL 80-952 Gdańsk, Poland.

Journal of Physics. Condensed Matter : an Institute of Physics Journal
|December 11, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study presents microscopic models for Josephson qubits using strong-coupling BCS theory, revealing complex energy levels and introducing new formulae with microscopic parameters for superconducting qubit spectra.

More Related Videos

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Quantum Computing

Background:

  • Superconducting qubits are crucial for quantum computing, but their theoretical descriptions often rely on simplified models.
  • Existing phenomenological models for Josephson junctions may not fully capture their complex quantum behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To derive microscopic models for small Josephson junctions (charge, flux, and phase qubits) using the strong-coupling BCS theory.
  • To present alternative formulae for superconducting qubit spectra incorporating microscopic parameters.
  • To investigate the emergence of degenerate energy levels and their implications for qubit behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Application of the strong-coupling version of the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory.
  • Derivation of microscopic models for various Josephson qubit types.
  • Comparison of derived formulae with experimental data.

Main Results:

  • Microscopic models reveal more complex energy level structures than phenomenological models.
  • Highly degenerate energy levels identified, acting as probability sinks for qubits.
  • Novel formulae for superconducting qubit spectra incorporating microscopic parameters are presented.
  • First-time estimation of Cooper pair density at zero temperature for an Al-based flux qubit.

Conclusions:

  • The strong-coupling BCS theory provides a more detailed description of Josephson qubits.
  • The identified degenerate levels highlight potential challenges and features in qubit design.
  • The developed formulae offer a more accurate and physically grounded approach to analyzing superconducting qubit spectra.
  • The study contributes to understanding small Josephson junctions as macroscopic quantum systems.