Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Impact of clinical and echocardiographic response to cardiac resynchronization therapy on long-term survival
Matteo Bertini1, Ulas Höke, Rutger J van Bommel
1Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Insights
Echocardiographic response, specifically reduced left ventricular end-systolic volume, is a better predictor of long-term survival in heart failure patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than clinical improvement alone.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Heart Failure Management
- Medical Device Therapy
Background:
- Mid-term responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in heart failure patients may differ in their long-term prognostic impact.
- Evaluating clinical versus echocardiographic response is crucial for predicting long-term outcomes in CRT-treated heart failure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine whether clinical or echocardiographic response to CRT is a superior predictor of long-term prognosis in heart failure patients.
- To compare the predictive value of mid-term CRT response definitions on long-term survival.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 679 heart failure patients undergoing CRT implantation was analyzed.
- Clinical response was defined as ≥1 NYHA class improvement, and echocardiographic response as ≥15% reduction in LV end-systolic volume at 6-month follow-up.
- Patients were prospectively followed for all-cause mortality.
Main Results:
- At 6 months, 77% showed clinical response and 62% showed echocardiographic response.
- During a mean follow-up of 37 months, 21% of patients died.
- Multivariable analysis revealed echocardiographic response (reduced LV end-systolic volume) as an independent predictor of superior survival (HR: 0.38; P < 0.001), unlike clinical response.
Conclusions:
- Mid-term echocardiographic response, specifically LV reverse remodeling, is a stronger predictor of long-term survival in heart failure patients treated with CRT.
- LV end-systolic volume reduction at 6 months post-CRT is more prognostic than clinical status improvement for long-term outcomes.
Background:
Clinical or echocardiographic mid-term responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may have a different influence on a long-term prognosis of heart failure patients treated with CRT. The aim of the evaluation was to establish which definition of response to CRT, clinical or echocardiographic, best predicts long-term prognosis.
Methods And Results:
A total of 679 heart failure patients treated with CRT were included. All the patients underwent a complete history and physical examination and transthoracic echocardiogram prior to CRT implantation and at 6-month follow-up. The clinical and echocardiographic responses to CRT were defined based on clinical improvement (≥1 NYHA class) and LV reverse remodelling (reduction in LV end-systolic volume ≥15%) at 6-month follow-up, respectively. All the patients were prospectively followed up for the occurrence of death. The mean age was 65 ± 11 years and 79% of the patients were male. At 6-month follow-up, 510 (77%) patients showed clinical response to CRT and 412 (62%) patients showed echocardiographic response to CRT. During a mean follow-up of 37 ± 22 months, 140 (21%) patients died. Clinical and echocardiographic responses to CRT were both significantly related to all-cause mortality on univariable analysis. However, on multivariable Cox-regression analysis only echocardiographic response to CRT was independently associated with superior survival (hazard ratio: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.27-0.50; P < 0.001).
Conclusion:
In a large population of heart failure patients treated with CRT, the reduction in LV end-systolic volume at the mid-term follow-up demonstrated to be a better predictor of long-term survival than improvement in the clinical status.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
