Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Map-based navigation: Individual differences in perspective taking and path integration.

Neuropsychologia·2026

Same author

Dense sampling for mapping pituitary growth dynamics before, during, and after pregnancy.

Journal of neuroendocrinology·2026

Same author

Graph properties drive navigational selection between equidistant routes.

Neuropsychologia·2025

Same author

Cognitive Graphs: Representational Substrates for Planning.

Decision (Washington, D.C.)·2025

Same author

Corrigendum to "Do total hippocampus and hippocampal subfield volumes relate to navigation ability? A call towards methodological consistency" [Cortex 181 (2024) 233-257].

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2025

Same author

Divide (evenly) and conquer (quickly): Spatial exploration behaviors predict navigational learning and differ by sex.

Cognition·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 16, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

Neural evidence supports a novel framework for spatial navigation.

Elizabeth R Chrastil¹

¹Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. chrastil@bu.edu

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

|December 12, 2012

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This review proposes a new cognitive framework for understanding human navigation, moving beyond traditional landmark, route, and survey knowledge. Neuroimaging reveals that brain activity doesn't neatly fit these categories, necessitating a process-based approach for spatial cognition.

More Related Videos

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Utilizing a Reconfigurable Maze System to Enhance the Reproducibility of Spatial Navigation Tests in Rodents

Utilizing a Reconfigurable Maze System to Enhance the Reproducibility of Spatial Navigation Tests in Rodents

Published on: December 2, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 16, 2026

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Modeling the Functional Network for Spatial Navigation in the Human Brain

Published on: October 13, 2023

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Assessing Human Spatial Navigation in a Virtual Space and its Sensitivity to Exercise

Published on: January 26, 2024

Utilizing a Reconfigurable Maze System to Enhance the Reproducibility of Spatial Navigation Tests in Rodents

Utilizing a Reconfigurable Maze System to Enhance the Reproducibility of Spatial Navigation Tests in Rodents

Published on: December 2, 2022

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Cognitive Psychology
Spatial Cognition

Background:

Traditional models of spatial knowledge (landmark, route, survey) are insufficient for explaining brain function in navigation.
Recent neuroimaging studies highlight limitations of existing behavioral frameworks.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose a new framework for understanding human spatial navigation based on cognitive processes.
To re-evaluate the neural correlates of spatial navigation by examining cognitive subprocesses.

Main Methods:

Literature review of behavioral and neuroimaging studies on spatial navigation.
Analysis of neural correlates associated with specific cognitive processes in spatial memory and wayfinding.

Main Results:

Neural correlates of spatial navigation are not exclusively tied to landmark, route, or survey knowledge.
A process-based taxonomy offers a more accurate model for understanding brain mechanisms in navigation.

Conclusions:

The traditional tripartite classification of spatial knowledge is inadequate for neuroscience.
A new framework focusing on cognitive processes is needed for a deeper understanding of human navigation and wayfinding.