Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
[The usefulness of evaluating effectiveness: pre-implantation genetic screening as an example]
1AMC, Centrum voor Voortplantingsgeneeskunde, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. m.twisk@amc.nl
Abstract:
Many treatments are applied in medical practice without a proper evaluation of their effectiveness. In this article, the possible negative consequences of such interventions are illustrated by using pre-implantation genetic screening (PGS) as an example. Research has shown that PGS is both expensive and ineffective. Hypothetically speaking, the non-performance of PGS saved 6 million euro in 2006 and the loss of 369 pregnancies was prevented. The investment in this research was much less than these 6 million euro saved. We postulate making the reimbursement of interventions dependent on their clinical effectiveness, and to use the money saved by this strategy for well-designed and well-executed research on the effectiveness of other interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Genetic Screens
Forward genetic screens
Forward or “classical” genetic screens involve creating random mutations in an organism’s DNA using radiation, mutagens, or insertion of additional bases, which result in visible changes...
CRISPR

