Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 16, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Measurement Models for Reasoned Action Theory
Michael Hennessy1, Amy Bleakley, Martin Fishbein
1Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, 202 S. 36 Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.
None:
Quantitative researchers distinguish between causal and effect indicators. What are the analytic problems when both types of measures are present in a quantitative reasoned action analysis? To answer this question, we use data from a longitudinal study to estimate the association between two constructs central to reasoned action theory: behavioral beliefs and attitudes toward the behavior. The belief items are causal indicators that define a latent variable index while the attitude items are effect indicators that reflect the operation of a latent variable scale. We identify the issues when effect and causal indicators are present in a single analysis and conclude that both types of indicators can be incorporated in the analysis of data based on the reasoned action approach.
Related Concept Videos
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
Primary Appraisal:...
Reason and Intuition
