Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ratio Level of Measurement00:54

Ratio Level of Measurement

The way a set of data is measured is called its level of measurement. Correct statistical procedures depend on a researcher being familiar with levels of measurement. For analysis, data are classified into four levels of measurement—nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio.
A set of data measured using the ratio scale takes care of the ratio problem and provides complete information. Ratio scale data are like interval scale data, except they have a zero point and ratios can be calculated. For...
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation01:16

Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation

The statistical interpretation of bioequivalence data is a significant aspect of pharmaceutical research. Bioequivalence refers to the absence of any significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient in pharmaceutical products becomes available at the site of drug action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions. This helps determine if different drug products have similar absorption rates, ensuring their interchangeability.Statistical...
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Odds Ratio01:09

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...
Interpreting R Charts01:22

Interpreting R Charts

R chart, or range chart, is a fundamental tool in statistical process control used to monitor the variability within a process. It complements the X-bar (x̄) chart by focusing on the range of the data, rather than individual values, providing a clear picture of the process dispersion over time.
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum values—of a sample...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

From abstracts to published articles: Assessing the scientific publications from the annual meetings of the German Spine Society (DWG) in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2022.

Brain & spine·2025
Same author

Craniectomy size and decompression of the temporal base using the altered posterior question-mark incision for decompressive hemicraniectomy.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Injury severity in polytrauma patients is underestimated using the injury severity score: a single-center correlation study in air rescue.

European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society·2017
Same author

Revision surgery for cervical artificial disc: Surgical technique and clinical results.

Clinical neurology and neurosurgery·2016
Same author

Randomised clinical trial: a phase 1, dose-ranging study of the anti-matrix metalloproteinase-9 monoclonal antibody GS-5745 versus placebo for ulcerative colitis.

Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics·2016
Same author

Simultaneous inference of a binary composite endpoint and its components.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

A Cost Effective and Adaptable Scratch Migration Assay
08:59

A Cost Effective and Adaptable Scratch Migration Assay

Published on: June 30, 2020

Analytical method transfer: improving interpretability with ratio-based statistical approaches.

C Frömke1, L A Hothorn, F Sczesny

  • 1Institut für Biometrie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany. cornelia.froemke@tiho-hannover.de

Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis
|December 19, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Method agreement between laboratories is crucial for reliable results. This study presents statistical methods for comparing location and scale, ensuring non-inferiority and improving result interpretation.

More Related Videos

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

A Cost Effective and Adaptable Scratch Migration Assay
08:59

A Cost Effective and Adaptable Scratch Migration Assay

Published on: June 30, 2020

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
16:23

Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction

Published on: February 26, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Laboratory medicine
  • Analytical chemistry
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Analytical method validation is essential before transferring methods between laboratories.
  • Ensuring agreement in measured outcomes across different laboratories is critical for data reliability.
  • Equivalence of locations (means) and non-inferiority of scales (standard deviations) are key agreement criteria.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present statistical approaches for assessing analytical method agreement between an originating and production laboratory.
  • To evaluate the performance of proposed methods regarding statistical power and type I error control.
  • To introduce an improved method for interpreting agreement using proportional differences and Bland-Altman plots.

Main Methods:

  • Development of parametric and non-parametric methods using marginal confidence intervals for ratios of locations and scales.
  • Application to matched pairs design without repeated measurements.
  • Simulation studies to assess power and type I error rates.
  • Proposal of a Bland-Altman plot with tolerance intervals.

Main Results:

  • The proposed methods provide a framework for statistically evaluating method agreement.
  • Simulation results demonstrate the power and type I error control of the presented approaches.
  • Proportional differences offer enhanced interpretability of results compared to absolute differences.

Conclusions:

  • The presented statistical methods effectively assess analytical method agreement between laboratories.
  • The use of proportional differences in Bland-Altman plots improves result interpretation.
  • These approaches are valuable for ensuring consistency in laboratory testing.