Related Experiment Videos
Minimal dose for effective clinical outcome and predictive factors for responsiveness to carvedilol: Japanese chronic
Hiroshi Okamoto1, Masatsugu Hori, Masunori Matsuzaki
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Hospital Organization, Hokkaido Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan. okamotoh@med.hokudai.ac.jp
Insights
Minimal carvedilol doses effectively manage chronic heart failure (CHF) by reducing heart rate (HR) and BNP, not just by dose. Early reductions in HR and BNP predict long-term outcomes in CHF patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Genetics
Background:
- Optimal beta-blocker dosing for chronic heart failure (CHF) survival benefits remains unclear.
- Predictive parameters for morbidity and mortality in CHF patients require identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the minimal effective dose of carvedilol for survival benefits in Japanese CHF patients.
- To identify the best predictive parameter for effective outcomes in CHF treatment.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, randomized trial involving 364 mild to moderate CHF patients.
- Patients received daily carvedilol doses of 2.5, 5, or 20mg alongside standard therapy.
- A 3-year follow-up assessed clinical outcomes, echocardiographic parameters, and genetic polymorphisms.
Main Results:
- Carvedilol reduced resting heart rate (HR) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) with dose-response in the early period.
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increased and left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDd) decreased, without dose-response.
- No significant difference in the primary endpoint (mortality/hospitalization); however, early HR and BNP reductions predicted outcomes, and adverse events were dose-dependent.
- Osteopontin (OPN) genotype G-156 del was associated with event-free survival.
Conclusions:
- Low-dose carvedilol is effective when HR and/or BNP are reduced, guiding therapy by these markers, particularly initial HR reduction.
- Carvedilol dosage should be guided by physiological response (HR, BNP) rather than solely by dose.
- Osteopontin (OPN) may serve as a genetic marker for predicting long-term event-free survival in CHF.
Background:
In chronic heart failure (CHF), it remains unclear whether the minimal dose of beta-blockade is related to survival benefits and which parameter predicts morbidity and mortality. We sought to determine the minimal dose related to survival benefits by comparing the efficacy and safety of three doses of carvedilol and the best predictive parameter for effective outcomes in Japanese patients with CHF.
Methods:
In this prospective, randomized, stratified trial, 364 patients with mild to moderate CHF were assigned to a daily carvedilol dose of 2.5, 5, or 20mg, plus optimal standard therapy.
Findings:
During the mean 3-year follow-up, resting heart rate (HR) and BNP were significantly reduced with dose-response relations in the early period but without dose-response relations in the late period. The LVEF and the LVDd were increased and decreased, respectively, without a dose-response relation. No significant difference was seen in the composite primary endpoint of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular diseases and heart failure. Multivariate analysis indicated early decreases in HR and BNP predicted long-term outcomes. However, adverse events increased dose-dependently. Among 237 polymorphisms in 87 heart failure-related genes, the osteopontin G-156 del genotype was associated with an event-free survival rate (Wilcoxon test, P=0.030).
Conclusions:
A low carvedilol dose is effective if the HR and/or plasma BNP has been reduced. Carvedilol therapy should be guided by reductions in HR and/or BNP, especially by initial HR reduction, but not only by its dose. OPN might be a surrogate genetic marker for long-term event-free survival.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure III: Clinical Manifestations
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Factors Affecting Drug Response: Overview
Dose-Response Relationship: Potency and Efficacy