Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) serves as the primary classification system for mental health disorders, providing standardized diagnostic criteria for clinicians and researchers. First published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in 1952, the DSM has undergone several revisions to reflect evolving psychiatric understanding. The fifth edition, DSM-5, released in 2013, introduced key updates that expanded diagnostic categories and modified diagnostic...

Self-Discrepancy Theory

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Proposing a two-stage screening approach to distinguish between transient and enduring postnatal depressive symptoms: A prospective cohort study.

International journal of nursing studies advances·2025

Same author

Comprehensive behavioural intervention for tics: a neurophysiological intervention.

Journal of integrative neuroscience·2022

Same author

Is Validating the Cutoff Score on Perinatal Mental Health Mood Screening Instruments, for Women and Men from Different Cultures or Languages, Really Necessary?

International journal of environmental research and public health·2022

Same author

Women's interpretation, understanding and attribution of the anhedonia question in the PHQ-4 and modified-Whooley questions in the antenatal period.

Journal of reproductive and infant psychology·2021

Same author

Depression in pregnancy "strongly predicts" depression postpartum: Are we inadvertently misleading clinicians and researchers?

Journal of affective disorders·2021

Same author

Errors and omissions in reporting research using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for fathers.

Midwifery·2021

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Association Between Sleep Quality and Cognitive Symptoms in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

Association Between Sleep Quality and Cognitive Symptoms in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

Published on: April 26, 2024

Errors in scoring the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale.

Stephen Matthey¹, Charmian Lee, Rudi Črnčec

¹South Western Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia. stephen.matthey@sswahs.nsw.gov.au

Archives of Women'S Mental Health

|December 19, 2012

Summary

Clinician scoring errors on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) are common, affecting up to 28.9% of forms. While concerning, these errors minimally impacted depression screening outcomes, suggesting improved scoring practices are needed.

More Related Videos

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Association Between Sleep Quality and Cognitive Symptoms in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

Association Between Sleep Quality and Cognitive Symptoms in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

Published on: April 26, 2024

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Use of a Video Scoring Anchor for Rapid Serial Assessment of Social Communication in Toddlers

Published on: March 14, 2018

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients

Published on: February 6, 2021

Area of Science:

Psychiatry
Clinical Psychology
Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a widely used screening tool for postpartum depression.
Reverse-scored items on the EPDS may contribute to clinician scoring errors.
Accurate scoring is crucial for reliable interpretation of mental health assessment tools.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the frequency and types of scoring errors made by clinicians using the EPDS.
To compare clinician-expected error rates with actual observed error rates.
To assess the impact of scoring errors on EPDS-based depression screening outcomes.

Main Methods:

Analysis of 496 EPDS forms from four clinical services for item and addition errors.
Survey of 22 clinicians regarding their expected and acceptable EPDS error rates.
Statistical comparison of error rates and their effect on screening cutoff scores.

Main Results:

Scoring errors (item or addition) were found in 13.4% to 28.9% of EPDS forms across sites.
Observed error rates exceeded clinicians' expectations and were deemed problematic by most.
Despite error prevalence, a meaningful impact on women scoring above EPDS cutoff points was not observed.

Conclusions:

Clinician scoring of the EPDS is frequently inaccurate, raising concerns among healthcare providers.
Implementing scoring templates and double-checking addition procedures may mitigate EPDS scoring errors.
While errors are prevalent, current rates do not significantly alter depression screening classifications, but improved accuracy is warranted.