Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Orthogonal Trajectories01:26

Orthogonal Trajectories

Orthogonal trajectories describe the geometric relationship between two families of curves that intersect each other at right angles. One illustrative case involves a family of parabolas that open sideways along the x-axis. These curves share a common shape but differ by a scaling parameter, resulting in a set of curves that all pass through the origin and widen at different rates.Determining Orthogonal TrajectoriesTo identify the orthogonal trajectories for these parabolas, the first step...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Angular Momentum: Single Particle01:10

Angular Momentum: Single Particle

Angular momentum is directed perpendicular to the plane of the rotation, and its magnitude depends on the choice of the origin. The perpendicular vector joining the linear momentum vector of an object to the origin is called the “lever arm.” If the lever arm and linear momentum are collinear, then the magnitude of the angular momentum is zero. Therefore, in this case, the object rotates about the origin such that it lies on the rim of the circumference defined by the lever arm magnitude.
The...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Newton-X platform for mixed quantum-classical dynamics.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2026
Same author

A semi-focused multi-state variant of the mapping approach to surface hopping.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

A Density Functional Theory and Semiempirical Framework for Trajectory Surface Hopping on Extended Systems.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Roadmap for Molecular Benchmarks in Nonadiabatic Dynamics.

The journal of physical chemistry. A·2025
Same author

The time-resolved photoelectron spectrum of trans-azobenzene and its relationship with the photoisomerization mechanism: A surface hopping simulation with determination of Dyson orbitals.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Conformational dynamics of the pyrene excimer.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

Surface hopping trajectory simulations with spin-orbit and dynamical couplings.

Giovanni Granucci1, Maurizio Persico, Gloria Spighi

  • 1Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale, Università di Pisa, via Risorgimento 35, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

The Journal of Chemical Physics
|December 20, 2012
PubMed
Summary

This study examines spin-orbit interactions in molecular dynamics simulations for spin-forbidden transitions. It compares spin-diabatic and spin-adiabatic methods, highlighting the spin-adiabatic approach

More Related Videos

Image-based Lagrangian Particle Tracking in Bed-load Experiments
10:32

Image-based Lagrangian Particle Tracking in Bed-load Experiments

Published on: July 20, 2017

3D Orbital Tracking in a Modified Two-photon Microscope: An Application to the Tracking of Intracellular Vesicles
11:28

3D Orbital Tracking in a Modified Two-photon Microscope: An Application to the Tracking of Intracellular Vesicles

Published on: October 1, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy
08:03

Study of Protein Dynamics via Neutron Spin Echo Spectroscopy

Published on: April 13, 2022

Image-based Lagrangian Particle Tracking in Bed-load Experiments
10:32

Image-based Lagrangian Particle Tracking in Bed-load Experiments

Published on: July 20, 2017

3D Orbital Tracking in a Modified Two-photon Microscope: An Application to the Tracking of Intracellular Vesicles
11:28

3D Orbital Tracking in a Modified Two-photon Microscope: An Application to the Tracking of Intracellular Vesicles

Published on: October 1, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Quantum Mechanics
  • Molecular Dynamics

Background:

  • Surface hopping simulations are crucial for modeling chemical dynamics.
  • Spin-forbidden transitions require accurate treatment of spin-orbit coupling.
  • Existing methods for incorporating spin-orbit effects have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate two distinct approaches for including spin-orbit interaction in surface hopping simulations.
  • To analyze the strengths and weaknesses of spin-diabatic and spin-adiabatic methods.
  • To provide insights into simulating spin-forbidden transitions accurately.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of spin-diabatic and spin-adiabatic approaches in surface hopping molecular dynamics.
  • Utilizing eigenstates of spin-free and total electronic Hamiltonians.
  • Analysis of spin-orbit coupling effects on transition dynamics.

Main Results:

  • The spin-diabatic approach, using spin-free eigenstates, shows inconsistencies, particularly with multiple spin multiplets.
  • The spin-adiabatic approach, based on total electronic Hamiltonian eigenstates, offers an alternative.
  • Both methods' advantages and disadvantages are discussed.

Conclusions:

  • The spin-adiabatic method is presented as a potentially more consistent approach for spin-orbit interactions in surface hopping.
  • Careful consideration of the chosen method is essential for accurate simulation of spin-forbidden transitions.
  • The study provides a comparative analysis to guide future research in the field.