Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry01:33

Peptide Identification Using Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Tandem mass spectrometry, also known as MS/MS or MS2, is an analytical technique that employs two mass analyzers. Essentially it is a series of mass spectrometers that helps isolate a particular biomolecule and then helps study its chemical properties.
This technique helps gather information regarding the protein from which the peptide was obtained and to study the peptides’ amino acid sequence. Identifying peptides from a complex mixture is an important component of the growing field of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Versatile microbial community responsible for nitrate turnover in a carbonate aquifer in southwest Germany.

FEMS microbiology ecology·2026
Same author

Interacting Species Database (ISDB): Comprehensive Resource for Interspecies Interactions at the Molecular Level.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Meet NUM-ENRICH: A Collaborative National Effort to Extend and Harmonize Research Infrastructures Within the German Network University Medicine.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Enabling Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning in Healthcare: The FLAME Architecture and Policy Framework.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

A Maturity Model for the Enforcement of PETs in Federated Settings.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Sequence to structure insights into Lassa virus population-level biophysical properties and glycoprotein structure catalogue.

Npj viruses·2026
Same journal

Platelet proteome links metabolism to reactivity in Essential Thrombocythemia.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Genetic rescue of disrupted synaptic protein interaction network dynamics following SYNGAP1 reactivation.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

ASAP-ID: Proximity labelling with small tags.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Proteome profiling reveals NQO2 activity contributing to proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma cell lines.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Depletion-Free Automated Enrichment of Serum Glycopeptides for High-Throughput Clinical Glycoproteomics.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
Same journal

Extracellular Vesicles from Glioblastoma Cells Reflect 2D vs. 3D Culture Adaptation and Resistance to Temozolomide.

Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

"Cell Surface Capture" Workflow for Label-Free Quantification of the Cell Surface Proteome
06:31

"Cell Surface Capture" Workflow for Label-Free Quantification of the Cell Surface Proteome

Published on: March 24, 2023

Tools for label-free peptide quantification.

Sven Nahnsen1, Chris Bielow, Knut Reinert

  • 1Center for Bioinformatics, Quantitative Biology Center and Department of Computer Science, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP
|December 20, 2012
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Quantitative proteomics analysis is complex. This review covers computational tools for label-free quantification, a scalable method for analyzing large datasets using feature intensities or spectral counting.

More Related Videos

Quantitative Analysis of Chromatin Proteomes in Disease
08:11

Quantitative Analysis of Chromatin Proteomes in Disease

Published on: December 28, 2012

Peptide and Protein Quantification Using Automated Immuno-MALDI (iMALDI)
08:57

Peptide and Protein Quantification Using Automated Immuno-MALDI (iMALDI)

Published on: August 18, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

"Cell Surface Capture" Workflow for Label-Free Quantification of the Cell Surface Proteome
06:31

"Cell Surface Capture" Workflow for Label-Free Quantification of the Cell Surface Proteome

Published on: March 24, 2023

Quantitative Analysis of Chromatin Proteomes in Disease
08:11

Quantitative Analysis of Chromatin Proteomes in Disease

Published on: December 28, 2012

Peptide and Protein Quantification Using Automated Immuno-MALDI (iMALDI)
08:57

Peptide and Protein Quantification Using Automated Immuno-MALDI (iMALDI)

Published on: August 18, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Proteomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Quantitative proteomics studies are growing in scale and complexity, posing analytical challenges.
  • Untargeted label-free quantification offers scalability, making it a viable alternative to labeling techniques.
  • Effective data analysis requires handling large datasets, automated processing, and robust statistical methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the current state-of-the-art computational tools for label-free quantification in untargeted proteomics.
  • To discuss the fundamental approaches and underlying algorithms of widely used software packages.
  • To briefly cover statistical strategies essential for reliable data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Feature-based quantification: Relies on summed mass spectrometric intensities of peptides.
  • Spectral counting: Based on the number of MS/MS spectra acquired per protein.
  • Review of existing algorithmic approaches and statistical methodologies in proteomics software.

Main Results:

  • Identified two primary methods for label-free quantification: feature-based and spectral counting.
  • Highlighted the importance of computational tools for managing and analyzing large-scale proteomics data.
  • Emphasized the necessity of thorough statistical analysis for reliable results in untargeted proteomics.

Conclusions:

  • Label-free quantification methods are crucial for scalable and cost-effective proteomics research.
  • The choice of computational tools and statistical strategies significantly impacts the reliability of quantitative proteomics data.
  • Further development in automated data processing and statistical analysis is needed to fully leverage label-free quantification.