Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Visualization of UV-induced Replication Intermediates in E. coli using Two-dimensional Agarose-gel Analysis
Published on: December 21, 2010
Direct and inverted repeats elicit genetic instability by both exploiting and eluding DNA double-strand break repair
Ewelina A Wojcik1, Anna Brzostek, Albino Bacolla
1Institute of Medical Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Lodz, Poland.
Abstract:
Repetitive DNA sequences with the potential to form alternative DNA conformations, such as slipped structures and cruciforms, can induce genetic instability by promoting replication errors and by serving as a substrate for DNA repair proteins, which may lead to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). However, the contribution of each of the DSB repair pathways, homologous recombination (HR), non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and single-strand annealing (SSA), to this sort of genetic instability is not fully understood. Herein, we assessed the genome-wide distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in the Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Escherichia coli genomes, and determined the types and frequencies of genetic instability induced by direct and inverted repeats, both in the presence and in the absence of HR, NHEJ, and SSA. All three genomes are strongly enriched in direct repeats and modestly enriched in inverted repeats. When using chromosomally integrated constructs in M. smegmatis, direct repeats induced the perfect deletion of their intervening sequences ~1,000-fold above background. Absence of HR further enhanced these perfect deletions, whereas absence of NHEJ or SSA had no influence, suggesting compromised replication fidelity. In contrast, inverted repeats induced perfect deletions only in the absence of SSA. Both direct and inverted repeats stimulated excision of the constructs from the attB integration sites independently of HR, NHEJ, or SSA. With episomal constructs, direct and inverted repeats triggered DNA instability by activating nucleolytic activity, and absence of the DSB repair pathways (in the order NHEJ>HR>SSA) exacerbated this instability. Thus, direct and inverted repeats may elicit genetic instability in mycobacteria by 1) directly interfering with replication fidelity, 2) stimulating the three main DSB repair pathways, and 3) enticing L5 site-specific recombination.
Insights
Repetitive DNA sequences like direct and inverted repeats cause genetic instability. Their absence impacts DNA repair pathways, affecting replication fidelity and DNA double-strand breaks in bacteria.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Microbiology
- Molecular Biology
Background:
- Repetitive DNA sequences can form alternative structures, leading to genetic instability and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs).
- The roles of homologous recombination (HR), non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), and single-strand annealing (SSA) in DSB repair related to repetitive DNA are not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the genome-wide distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in Mycobacterium smegmatis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Escherichia coli.
- To determine the types and frequencies of genetic instability induced by direct and inverted repeats, and to assess the involvement of HR, NHEJ, and SSA pathways.
Main Methods:
- Genome-wide analysis of repetitive DNA sequences in bacterial genomes.
- Experimental assessment of genetic instability using chromosomally integrated and episomal constructs in Mycobacterium smegmatis.
- Evaluation of genetic instability in the presence and absence of key DNA double-strand break repair pathways (HR, NHEJ, SSA).
Main Results:
- All analyzed genomes are enriched in direct and inverted repeats.
- Direct repeats in M. smegmatis primarily induce perfect deletions, enhanced by the absence of HR.
- Inverted repeats induce perfect deletions only in the absence of SSA, and both repeat types stimulate construct excision.
- Episomal constructs show repeat-induced instability exacerbated by the absence of NHEJ, HR, and SSA.
Conclusions:
- Direct and inverted repeats contribute to bacterial genetic instability through replication interference and by engaging DNA repair pathways.
- The specific DSB repair pathways involved in mitigating repeat-induced instability vary depending on the repeat type and construct context.
- Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for comprehending genome evolution and stability in bacteria.
More Related Videos
11:19Inducing a Site Specific Replication Blockage in E. coli Using a Fluorescent Repressor Operator System
Published on: August 21, 2016
06:59Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter
Published on: March 31, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Homologous Recombination
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
Spontaneous and Induced Mutations
Inhibitors of Bacterial DNA Synthesis
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...