Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
Sequential therapy in metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma: TKI-TKI vs TKI-mTOR
Alessandra Felici1, Emilio Bria, Giampaolo Tortora
1Division of Medical Oncology A, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute,Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Abstract:
With seven targeted agents, directed against the VEGF/VEGF receptor (VEGFR) axis or the mTOR pathway, approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and more active agents in advanced phase of clinical testing, questions have arisen with regard to their optimal use, either in combination or in sequence. One of the most compelling (and debated) issues is whether continued VEGF/VEGFR inhibition with agents hitting the same targets (TKI-TKI) affords better results than switching mechanisms of action by alternating VEGFR and mTOR inhibition (TKI-mTOR). In this article, the authors review the (little) available evidence coming from randomized Phase III clinical trials and try to fill in the (many) remaining gaps using evidence from small-size, single-arm Phase II studies and retrospective series, as well as reviewing preclinical evidence supporting either strategy.
Insights
For metastatic renal cell carcinoma, this review compares continuous VEGF/VEGFR inhibition versus alternating VEGFR and mTOR pathways. Evidence from clinical trials and preclinical studies informs optimal treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Research
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment landscape includes seven approved targeted agents.
- Agents target either the VEGF/VEGFR axis or the mTOR pathway.
- Optimal sequencing or combination of these agents remains under investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review evidence comparing continuous VEGF/VEGFR inhibition (TKI-TKI) versus alternating VEGFR and mTOR inhibition (TKI-mTOR) in mRCC.
- To address the optimal use of targeted agents in mRCC treatment.
- To identify gaps in current evidence and explore supporting data.
Main Methods:
- Review of randomized Phase III clinical trials.
- Analysis of evidence from small-size, single-arm Phase II studies.
- Inclusion of retrospective series and preclinical evidence.
Main Results:
- Limited direct comparative evidence from Phase III trials exists.
- Phase II and retrospective data provide insights into TKI-TKI and TKI-mTOR strategies.
- Preclinical evidence may support the rationale for either approach.
Conclusions:
- The optimal sequence or combination of VEGF/VEGFR and mTOR inhibitors in mRCC requires further elucidation.
- Evidence synthesis suggests a complex decision-making process for clinicians.
- Future research should focus on generating robust data to guide treatment selection.
More Related Videos
06:38A Syngeneic Mouse Model of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma for Quantitative and Longitudinal Assessment of Preclinical Therapies
Published on: April 12, 2017
07:42Assessment of Resistance to Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors by an Interrogation of Signal Transduction Pathways by Antibody Arrays
Published on: September 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Tumor Immunotherapy
PI3K/mTOR/AKT Signaling Pathway