Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Sputter Growth and Characterization of Metamagnetic B2-ordered FeRh Epilayers
Published on: October 5, 2013
Role of domain wall fluctuations in non-Fermi-liquid behavior of metamagnets
Vladimir A Zyuzin1, A Yu Zyuzin
1Department of Physics, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA. zyuzin.vova@gmail.com
Abstract:
In this paper we study the resistivity temperature dependence of a three-dimensional metamagnet near the metamagnetic phase transition point. The phase transition is characterized by a phase separation of regions with high and low magnetization. We show that, in the case of weak pinning, the spin relaxation time of the domain wall, which separates the two phases, is much larger than that of the volume spin fluctuations. This opens a temperature range where resistivity temperature dependence is determined by scattering of conducting electrons by the domain wall fluctuations. We show that it leads to quasi-linear low temperature dependence of resistivity.
More Related Videos
09:06Visualizing Uniaxial-strain Manipulation of Antiferromagnetic Domains in Fe1+YTe Using a Spin-polarized Scanning Tunneling Microscope
Published on: March 24, 2019
07:42Optimizing Magnetic Force Microscopy Resolution and Sensitivity to Visualize Nanoscale Magnetic Domains
Published on: July 20, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Ferromagnetism
Paramagnetism
Diamagnetism
Diamagnetism was discovered by Anton Brugmans in 1778 when he observed that bismuth gets repelled by magnetic fields, thus theorizing that diamagnets get repelled by magnets.
Magnetostatic Boundary Conditions
Magnetic Damping
If, however, the bob is a slotted metal plate, the magnet produces a much smaller effect. When a slotted metal plate enters the field, an emf is induced by the change in flux; however, it is less effective because the slots limit the...
Magnetic Susceptibility and Permeability
When diamagnetic materials are placed under an external magnetic field, the moments opposite to the field are induced. Hence, the susceptibility for diamagnets has a minimal negative value of 10-5–10-6. Since...