Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

Grafting materials in skull base reconstruction.

Kara K Prickett1, Sarah K Wise

  • 1Emory University Department of Otolaryngology, Atlanta, GA 30308, USA.

Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
|December 22, 2012
PubMed
Summary

Choosing the right graft material for endoscopic skull base repair is key. Options range from autologous tissue to engineered products, with surgeon experience guiding successful outcomes.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systemic Corticosteroids in the Management of Sinonasal Disease: An Evidence-Based Expert Review.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2026
Same author

Disease Remission: A Scoping Review With Thematic Analysis of the Scientific Literature With Implications for Chronic Rhinosinusitis.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2026
Same author

Utilizing a publicly accessible automated machine learning platform to enable diagnosis before tumor surgery.

Communications medicine·2025
Same author

Central Compartment Atopic Disease: Analysis of Current Literature and Proposal of Diagnostic Criteria.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2025
Same author

Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis Diagnosis, Management, Associated Conditions, Pathophysiology, and Future Directions: Summary of a Multidisciplinary Workshop.

International forum of allergy & rhinology·2025
Same author

Outcomes of Children With Tracheostomy Before and After Implementing Caregiver Simulation-Based Tracheostomy Education.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2025

Area of Science:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Otolaryngology
  • Biomaterials Science

Background:

  • Endoscopic skull base surgery utilizes various grafting materials for repair.
  • Graft options include autologous tissue, acellular human dermis, engineered collagen, rigid supports, and tissue glues.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and categorize available graft materials for endoscopic skull base repair.
  • To discuss the evidence supporting the use of different grafting materials.
  • To provide guidance on selecting appropriate materials based on case characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and categorization of grafting materials.
  • Analysis of evidence for commonly used sealants and graft types.
  • Discussion of factors influencing material selection.

Main Results:

  • Autologous tissues are common due to safety, availability, and cost.
  • Engineered collagen and acellular dermis are suitable for revision or larger repairs.
  • The necessity of rigid support is debated, with increasing use of pedicled grafts for large defects.
  • Tissue glues and sealants are widely employed, with their components and evidence detailed.

Conclusions:

  • Limited high-quality comparative evidence exists for graft material selection.
  • Excellent outcomes are achievable with most materials when surgeon experience and patient factors are considered.
  • Careful consideration of graft properties and clinical context is essential for successful endoscopic skull base repair.

More Related Videos

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
13:16

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts

Published on: December 22, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
10:28

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration

Published on: November 16, 2018

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
13:16

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts

Published on: December 22, 2015