Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026
07:32
Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
No statistically significant results for two removable orthodontic retainers.
1NYU College of Dentistry, New York, USA.
Evidence-Based Dentistry
|December 22, 2012
Summary
This study found no significant difference in survival times between Hawley retainers (HR) and clear overlay retainers (COR). Both retainer types are suitable for orthodontic patients, as breakage does not impact their longevity.
Area of Science:
- Orthodontics
- Dental Materials Science
Background:
- This study compared the survival rates of Hawley retainers (HR) and clear overlay retainers (COR) in orthodontic patients.
- Both retainer types are commonly used for post-treatment tooth stabilization.
Discussion:
- Fracture was the primary cause of retainer failure, with different fracture patterns observed between HR and COR.
- Retainer loss was the second most common reason for failure.
Key Insights:
- No statistically significant difference was found in the survival times of HR and COR.
- Clinicians can confidently recommend either HR or COR to patients without concern for differential breakage rates.
Outlook:
- Further research could explore modifications to retainer design to improve fracture resistance.
- Long-term patient-reported outcomes and satisfaction with both retainer types warrant investigation.
