Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Lateralized interference in finger tapping: initial value differences do not affect the outcome.

D W Kee1, B Cherry

  • 1Department of Psychology, California State University, Fullerton 92634.

Neuropsychologia
|January 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Investigations into the Life Cycle of Calliobothrium verticillatum, a Tapeworm of Mustelus canis.

The Biological bulletin·2018
Same author

Risk-based cost modelling of oral rabies vaccine interventions for raccoon rabies.

Zoonoses and public health·2008
Same author

Serologic evidence for West Nile virus infection in birds in Staten Island, New York, after an outbreak in 2000.

Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)·2003
Same author

Sentinel chickens as a surveillance tool for West Nile virus in New York City, 2000.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2002
Same author

West Nile virus infection in mosquitoes, birds, horses, and humans, Staten Island, New York, 2000.

Emerging infectious diseases·2001
Same author

Dead crow densities and human cases of West Nile virus, New York State, 2000.

Emerging infectious diseases·2001
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From Past Recall to Future Projection: What Does Verb Tense Production Reveal About Mental Time Travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

Dual-task interference in cognitive studies may not solely indicate hemispheric lateralization. This research demonstrates lateralized finger-tapping interference persists even when initial performance differences are controlled, suggesting a genuine cognitive effect.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Performance

Background:

  • Dual-task studies often show asymmetric interference, potentially indicating hemispheric lateralization.
  • Willis and Goodwin (1987) proposed this interference might be a statistical artifact due to initial performance differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether lateralized interference in dual-task performance is a genuine cognitive phenomenon or a statistical artifact.
  • To determine if asymmetric interference persists after controlling for baseline performance differences.

Main Methods:

  • A study involving concurrent performance of finger-tapping and anagram solution tasks.
  • Experimental control to remove initial right-hand advantage in baseline tapping performance.
  • Observation of lateralized finger-tapping interference during the dual-task condition.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Lateralized finger-tapping interference was observed during concurrent anagram solution.
  • This interference effect remained evident even after accounting for baseline tapping performance disparities.
  • The findings challenge the artifactual explanation for asymmetric interference in dual-task paradigms.

Conclusions:

  • Asymmetric interference in dual-task scenarios is not solely a statistical artifact of initial-values differences.
  • The observed lateralized interference suggests a genuine cognitive or neural basis, potentially related to hemispheric processing.
  • Further research is needed to elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying this lateralized interference.