Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Magnetometric Characterization of Intermediates in the Solid-State Electrochemistry of Redox-Active Metal-Organic Frameworks
Published on: June 9, 2023
Structural diversity and magnetic properties of five copper-organic frameworks containing one-, two-, and three-types
Bo Shen1, Peng-Fei Shi, Yin-Ling Hou
1Department of Chemistry, Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Material Chemistry, MOE, TKL of Metal and Molecule Based Material Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China.
Abstract:
Five novel compounds {[Cu(CMA)]·0.8H(2)O}(n) (1), {[Cu(CMA)(bpy)(0.5)]·0.5DMF}(n) (2), {[Cu(CMA)(bpy)(H(2)O)]·0.5H(2)O}(n) (3), {[Cu(2)(CMA)(DPA)(bpy)(2)(H(2)O)]ClO(4)}(n) (4) and {[Cu(3)(CMA)(DPA)(bpy)(4)(OH)](ClO(4))(2)·3H(2)O)}(n) (5) (H(2)CMA = 3-(carboxymethoxy)-5-methylbenzoic acid, HDPA = 2-(3,5-dimethylphenoxy)acetic acid, bpy = 4,4'-bipyridine) were synthesized and characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Interestingly, the kinds of ligands included in these compounds are different: 1 contains single-ligand CMA(2-); 2 and 3 comprise two kinds of ligands (CMA(2-) and bpy); 4 and 5 cover three kinds of ligands (CMA(2-), DPA(-) and bpy). Structural analyses reveal that 1-3, and 5 are three-dimensional (3D) frameworks, while 4 is a 2D layer. Noteworthily, 1 possesses two types of channels: six-star and hexagonal ones. 3 displays a three-fold interpenetrating 3D framework. The structural diversity of the compounds may have originated from different anions, solvents and temperatures. Variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements were carried out on compounds 1, 2 and 4, and the magnetic properties are dramatically different due to the structural diversities. The magnetic data of 1 shows an antiferromagnetic interaction with J = -54.84 cm(-1) estimated from the Bonner-Fisher model. The magnetic data of 2 was least-square fitted to the Blenaey-Bowers equation with J = -131.01 cm(-1), indicating the existence of a strong antiferromagnetic interaction between two adjacent Cu(2+). The magnetic data of linear tetranuclear structure 4 was best fitted to the expression derived from the Hamiltonian H = -2(2J(1)S(1)S(2) + J(2)S(1)S(1*)). The best fitting parameters are J(1) = -17.48 cm(-1) and J(2) = -65.26 cm(-1), which also indicate an antiferromagnetic interaction. Simultaneously, the magneto-structural relationship was discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human eye.
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Valence Bond Theory
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Coordination Number and Geometry
Structural Isomerism
Isomers are different chemical species that have the same chemical formula. Structural isomerism of coordination compounds can be divided into two subcategories, the linkage isomers and coordination-sphere isomers.
Linkage isomers occur when the coordination compound contains a ligand that can bind to the transition metal center through two different atoms. For example, the CN− ligand can bind through the carbon atom or through the nitrogen atom. Similarly, SCN− can be...

