Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Transmesenteric Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Trendelenburg Position for Horseshoe Kidney with Hydronephrosis
Published on: July 8, 2025
Ureteroscopy in pediatric patients with spinal abnormalities.
Caroline J Colangelo1, George Kaplan, Kerrin Palazzi
1Department of Urology, University of California-San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
Pediatric ureteroscopy (URS) for ureteral stones is less effective and has more complications in patients with spinal deformities or hardware. These spinal abnormalities increase risks and decrease stone-free rates compared to children with normal anatomy.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Urology
- Endourology
- Spinal Deformities
Background:
- Ureteroscopy (URS) is a standard treatment for pediatric ureteral stones.
- Anatomic variations in patients with scoliosis or spinal hardware can complicate URS.
- The impact of spinal abnormalities on URS outcomes in children is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of URS in pediatric patients with spinal hardware or deformities.
- To compare complication rates and stone-free status between pediatric patients with and without spinal abnormalities undergoing URS.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 130 ureteroscopic procedures in 102 pediatric patients.
- Patients were categorized into two groups: normal spinal anatomy and spinal abnormalities (hardware or moderate-to-severe scoliosis).
- Key parameters included demographics, stone burden, intraoperative complications, and stone-free status.
Main Results:
- Of 105 URS for stones, 9 patients had spinal abnormalities.
- Stone-free rates were 61% in normal anatomy patients vs. 35.7% in those with spinal deformities.
- Complication rates were 6.1% in normal anatomy patients vs. 40% in those with spinal deformities.
Conclusions:
- Spinal hardware and deformities are associated with increased complications and lower stone-free rates in pediatric URS.
- URS in pediatric patients with spinal deformities is less safe and efficacious than in those with normal anatomy.
- URS can still be considered a primary treatment modality in this patient group.
Related Concept Videos
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Ureters
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography
Urinary Tract Calculi V: Nursing Management