Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perceived roughness as a function of body locus.

J C Stevens1

  • 1John B. Pierce Foundation Laboratory, New Haven, CT 06519.

Perception & Psychophysics
|March 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimising seed processing techniques to improve germination and sowability of native grasses for ecological restoration.

Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)·2018
Same author

A complex case of Down syndrome in mother and fetus: obstetric and ethical considerations.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2012
Same author

Parental environment changes the dormancy state and karrikinolide response of Brassica tournefortii seeds.

Annals of botany·2012
Same author

Familial Alzheimer's disease and inherited prion disease in the UK are poorly ascertained.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2010
Same author

Long-term trends in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Neurology·2009
Same author

Assessment: the use of natalizumab (Tysabri) for the treatment of multiple sclerosis (an evidence-based review): report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Neurology·2008
Same journal

Response organization in selective adaptation to speech sounds.

Perception & psychophysics·2014
Same journal

Reaction times to comparisons within and across phonetic categories.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Simple and contingent adaptation effects for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Auditory property detectors and processing place features in stop consonants.

Perception & psychophysics·2012
Same journal

Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities.

Perception & psychophysics·2008
See all related articles

Human perception of surface roughness varies significantly across different body locations. Sensitivity is highest on the lips and fingers, and lowest on the thigh and back.

Area of Science:

  • * Neuroscience
  • * Sensory Physiology
  • * Human Perception

Background:

  • * The perception of texture and roughness is a complex tactile sensation.
  • * Previous research suggests a power function relationship between physical properties of a surface and perceived roughness.
  • * The influence of body location on tactile perception of roughness is not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • * To investigate how perceived roughness of grooved metallic surfaces varies across ten different body loci.
  • * To determine if the relationship between groove width and perceived roughness is consistent across all body locations.
  • * To compare the rank order of body loci for roughness sensitivity with other known tactile sensitivities.

Main Methods:

  • * Twenty human subjects participated in the study.

Related Experiment Videos

  • * Magnitude estimations of surface roughness were collected for grooved metallic surfaces.
  • * Stimuli were applied to ten distinct body loci.
  • Main Results:

    • * Perceived roughness generally increased as a power function of groove width.
    • * The exponents and intercepts of this power function were strongly dependent on the body locus.
    • * Roughness sensitivity was highest on the lips, fingers, and forearm, and lowest on the heel, back, and thigh.
    • * Differences in sensitivity among body loci became more pronounced with increasing groove width.

    Conclusions:

    • * The human somatosensory system exhibits significant spatial variation in its sensitivity to surface roughness.
    • * The pattern of roughness sensitivity across body loci parallels that of punctate pressure sensitivity.
    • * This spatial variation in tactile perception has implications for understanding sensory coding and neural representation.