Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...

Social Traps

Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned more cows, the larger...

Errors in Taping

Errors in Taping

Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...

Random Error

Random Error

Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...

Deviation from Ideal Behaviour

Deviation from Ideal Behaviour

Real gases do not perfectly obey the ideal gas laws, especially at high pressures and low temperatures or when they are about to condense to a liquid. These deviations occur due to intermolecular forces between gas molecules. Repulsive forces aid expansion and are significant when molecules are very close together, typically at high pressure. Attractive forces assist compression and have a longer range, being effective over several molecular diameters. They become significant when molecules are...

Attribution Theory

Attribution Theory

Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Should Primary Care Be Covered by Insurance?

Journal of general internal medicine·2025

Same author

Health Insurance Coverage-Is Broader Always Better?

JAMA internal medicine·2024

Same author

Pharmacy Benefit Managers: History, Business Practices, Economics, and Policy.

JAMA health forum·2023

Same author

Do Nonprofit Hospitals Deserve Their Tax Exemption?

The New England journal of medicine·2023

Same author

Association of Past and Future Paid Medical Malpractice Claims.

JAMA health forum·2023

Same author

Criminal Records and Licensure in Five Allied Health Professions: Is There Evidence of a Disparate Impact on Historically Marginalized Groups?

Journal of health politics, policy and law·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

Something went wrong on the way to the courthouse.

David A Hyman¹

¹University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.

Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law

|December 25, 2012

Summary

Law professors wrongly predicted the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). This failure stemmed from motivated reasoning, overconfidence, and political activism rather than objective legal analysis.

Area of Science:

Legal Studies
Constitutional Law
Behavioral Economics

Background:

Legal scholars widely dismissed the unconstitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).
Judicial review of the PPACA presented an unexpected challenge to established legal predictions.
The discrepancy between expert predictions and judicial outcomes warrants examination.

Purpose of the Study:

To explain the failure of law professors to accurately predict judicial outcomes regarding the PPACA's constitutionality.
To identify the factors contributing to the misjudgment of legal scholars.
To analyze the influence of cognitive biases and political motivations on legal analysis.

Main Methods:

Qualitative analysis of legal scholarship and commentary on the PPACA.

More Related Videos

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing (CCM) System

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing (CCM) System

Published on: October 1, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Humor or Rationality? The Neural Mechanisms of How Agent Type and Language Style Influence Satisfaction with Ride-Hailing Service Failure Recovery

Published on: March 13, 2026

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing (CCM) System

Operation of the Collaborative Composite Manufacturing (CCM) System

Published on: October 1, 2019

Examination of psychological factors influencing expert judgment in constitutional law.

Analysis of the shift in academic response as the PPACA faced legal challenges.

Main Results:

Law professors exhibited motivated reasoning, aligning predictions with political preferences.
Cognitive biases led to overestimation of the PPACA's likelihood of survival and suppression of doubts.
Post-ruling, many scholars shifted from legal analysis to political advocacy.

Conclusions:

The failure to predict the PPACA's constitutional challenges was driven by cognitive biases and political motivations.
Legal scholars' predictions were compromised by a lack of objective assessment.
The study highlights the impact of external factors on expert legal forecasting.