Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Cardiac Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis Using Conductance Catheters in Mice
Published on: September 17, 2015
Aortic elastic properties : effects of carvedilol versus nebivolol
M R Sayin1, M Aydin, S M Dogan
1Department of Cardiology, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey. sayinmr@mynet.com
Insights
This study found that both carvedilol and nebivolol effectively lowered blood pressure and heart rate in patients with hypertension. While nebivolol showed a slight edge in improving heart function, neither drug significantly altered aortic elastic properties.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Hypertension Management
Background:
- Aortic elastic properties are crucial indicators of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in hypertension.
- Newer generation beta-blockers, such as carvedilol and nebivolol, offer potential therapeutic benefits for hypertensive patients.
- Understanding their impact on vascular elasticity is essential for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effects of carvedilol and nebivolol on aortic elastic properties in patients with stage 1 hypertension.
- To evaluate changes in aortic strain (AS), aortic distensibility (AD), and aortic stiffness index (ASI) following treatment.
- To assess the comparative efficacy of these beta-blockers on hemodynamic parameters and cardiac function.
Main Methods:
- A randomized study involving 47 treatment-naive stage 1 hypertensive patients.
- Participants received either carvedilol (25 mg/day) or nebivolol (5 mg/day) for 3 months.
- Aortic elastic parameters were measured using echocardiography.
Main Results:
- Both carvedilol and nebivolol significantly reduced systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate.
- Improvements in left ventricular diastolic function were observed in both groups, with nebivolol showing a slight advantage.
- While aortic elastic properties showed a trend towards improvement with both drugs, these changes were not statistically significant.
Conclusions:
- Carvedilol and nebivolol are effective in lowering blood pressure and heart rate and improving left ventricular diastolic function in hypertensive patients.
- Neither drug significantly impacted aortic elastic properties, though nebivolol demonstrated a slightly greater benefit.
- Further long-term studies with larger cohorts are warranted to fully elucidate the vascular effects of these agents.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the new generation β-blocker anti-hypertensive drugs carvedilol and nebivolol on aortic elastic properties which are important indicators of hypertension-related morbidity and mortality.
Methods:
A total of 50 patients who had been diagnosed with stage 1 hypertension according to the Joint National Committee (JNC) VII criteria and who had not received any anti-hypertensive treatment were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized to receive either 25 mg/day carvedilol (n=25) or 5 mg/day nebivolol (n=25) for 3 months at the beginning of the study. Three patients (1 in the carvedilol group, 2 in the nebivolol group) who did not attend 3 month follow-up measurements were excluded from the study. The study was completed with 47 patients (25 women; mean age: 49 ± 9 years). The aortic elastic parameters such as aortic strain (AS), aortic distensibility (AD), and aortic stiffness index (ASI) were measured by echocardiography.
Results:
Carvedilol and nebivolol provided a similar decline in both systolic and diastolic blood pressures (-12/-7 mmHg, p<0.0001 and -12/-7 mmHg, p=0.002, respectively). Both carvedilol and nebivolol induced a significant decrease in heart rate (-15 bpm, p<0.0001, -17 bpm, p<0.0001, respectively). Even though the heart rate at the end of the treatment was lower for the nebivolol group, the rate of decrease of heart rates between carvedilol and nebivolol groups was not statistically significant (p=0.074). Both groups demonstrated improvements in the diastolic functions of the left ventricle where certain values showed more improvement for the nebivolol group. Both groups showed improvements in AS and AD rates compared to basal rates; however, these improvements were not statistically significant. Although the improvement rates in AS, AD, and ASI were higher in the nebivolol group compared to the carvedilol group, the differences were not statistically significant (p=0.091, p=0.095, p=0.259, respectively).
Conclusion:
Both carvedilol and nebivolol induced a decrease in blood pressure and heart rate and showed an improvement in left ventricular diastolic functions. It was observed that both drugs did not cause deterioration in the aortic elastic properties but a slight improvement was seen. However, this improvement was not statistically significant. The improvement was more explicit in the nebivolol group. It may be concluded that nebivolol is slightly superior to carvedilol in reducing heart rate and improving left ventricular diastolic functions. However, further long-term studies with larger sample sizes should be performed in order to better define the effects of both drugs.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Types of β-Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Action of β1 Blockers
Antihypertensive Drugs: Vasodilators
Antianginal Drugs: Nitrates and β-Blockers
Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, play a pivotal role. Once metabolized, they liberate nitric oxide, a molecular marvel. Nitric oxide triggers guanylyl cyclase and augments cGMP production. This biochemical cascade orchestrates the relaxation of vascular smooth muscles, ushering in vasodilation and enhancing coronary blood flow. Administered...
