Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Comparison of acceptance-based and standard cognitive-based coping strategies for craving sweets in overweight and
Evan M Forman1, Kimberly L Hoffman, Adrienne S Juarascio
1Department of Psychology, Drexel University, 245 N. 15th Street, MS 626, Philadelphia, PA 19102, USA. evan.forman@drexel.edu
Abstract:
Existing strategies for coping with food cravings are of unknown efficacy and rely on principles that have been shown to have paradoxical effects. The present study evaluated novel, acceptance-based strategies for coping with craving by randomly assigning 48 overweight women to either an experimental psychological acceptance-oriented intervention or a standard cognitive reappraisal/distraction intervention. Participants were required to carry a box of sweets on their person for 72 h while abstaining from any consumption of sweets. Results suggested that the acceptance-based coping strategies resulted in lower cravings and reduced consumption, particularly for those who demonstrate greater susceptibility to the presence of food and report a tendency to engage in emotional eating.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Regulation
Coping Strategies: Emotion Focused
Binge Eating Disorders
Coping Strategies: Problem Focused
For example, consider a student who struggles to understand their...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Self-Schemas

