Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Echo01:06

Echo

The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...
Sound Waves: Interference00:53

Sound Waves: Interference

Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cutaneous Alternating Current Stimulation Can Cause a Phasic Modulation of Speech Perception.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on neural oscillations in speech perception are replicable and predictable.

Brain stimulation·2025
Same author

The Inattentional Rhythm in Audition.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2025
Same author

Challenges and Approaches in the Study of Neural Entrainment.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2024
Same author

Opposing neural processing modes alternate rhythmically during sustained auditory attention.

Communications biology·2024
Same author

Entrainment echoes in the cerebellum.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

Modelling detection thresholds for sounds repeated at different delays.

Peter Heil1, Jesko L Verhey, Benedikt Zoefel

  • 1Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Brenneckestr. 6, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany. peter.heil@lin-magdeburg.de

Hearing Research
|December 27, 2012
PubMed
Summary

A new probabilistic model accurately predicts auditory detection thresholds for multiple sounds, revealing insights into temporal integration and auditory filter bandwidths.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
14:05

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses

Published on: January 23, 2017

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Detection thresholds for multiple sounds are generally better than for single sounds, suggesting temporal integration in the auditory system.
  • Previous models, like Krumbholz and Wiegrebe (1998), struggled to fully explain how detection thresholds vary with temporal delays and frequency.
  • Existing research indicates that auditory filter characteristics may be influenced by experimental paradigms and stimuli used.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present and validate a simple probabilistic model for predicting auditory detection thresholds for pairs and multiple sounds.
  • To investigate the role of auditory filter bandwidth and temporal processing in sound detection.
  • To re-evaluate how psychophysical methods estimate auditory filter characteristics.

Main Methods:

  • A probabilistic model incorporating a 4th-order gammatone filter with a broad bandwidth was developed.
  • The model includes stochastic event formation, with probability proportional to the filter output raised to the power of 3, and probability summation.
  • Model predictions were tested against existing data for pairs of tones, pairs of clicks in noise, and multiple temporally separated sounds.

Main Results:

  • The model accurately predicts detection thresholds for pairs of tones across varying delays and frequencies.
  • It also successfully predicts thresholds for pairs of clicks in noise, including effects of delay, polarity, and intensity.
  • The model correctly accounts for improved detection with an increasing number of temporally separated sounds, confirming an exponent of 3.

Conclusions:

  • A simple probabilistic model provides a robust explanation for auditory detection of multiple sounds.
  • The findings suggest that auditory filter bandwidths estimated via psychophysics may be more stimulus- and paradigm-dependent than previously assumed.
  • The study highlights the importance of temporal integration and stochastic processes in auditory perception.