Treated vs reported toxic exposures: discrepancies between a poison control center and a member hospital

Statistics accumulated by Poison Control Centers (PCC) are routinely used on the local, regional and national levels by governmental agencies to set policy and direct funding. Incomplete reporting by member hospitals is recognized by PCC as a factor contributing to discrepancies in epidemiological estimates; however little emphasis is classically placed by the PCC on expanding reporting from member hospitals. A 1y retrospective review of patients with toxic exposure presenting to an urban Emergency Medicine Department (EMD) was performed to quantify the lack of concordance between treated and reported toxic exposures. 470 toxic exposures presented over the study period, of which only 123 (26%) were relayed to the regional PCC. Inhalation exposures were least likely to be referred for PCC consultation (3%); whereas PCC consultation was obtained for 33% venomous snake bite cases, and 95% of the cyclic antidepressant ingestions. Clusters of similar exposures resulted in fewer PCC consultations. Understanding each hospital's "profile" for handling toxic exposures, and individualized advertisement by the PCC to their member hospital may increase their data reporting. The statistical significance of their epidemiological studies as well as their revenue may increase.