Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Variational autoencoder for explainable seizure onset phases detection.

Journal of neural engineering·2026
Same author

Paradoxical inhibition of autonomic output following cortical suppression: When inhibiting an inhibitor results in more (not less) inhibition.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same author

Limited Efficacy of 3 mA Intensified tDCS of the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex for OCD Treatment: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Study.

CNS neuroscience & therapeutics·2026
Same author

Restoring oscillatory dynamics in Alzheimer's disease: A laminar whole-brain model of serotonergic psychedelic effects.

Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Emergence of multifrequency activity in a laminar neural mass model.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Optimized multichannel 4 mA vs conventional transcranial direct current stimulation for major depressive disorder: A randomized sham-controlled trial.

Molecular psychiatry·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Simultaneous Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:25

Simultaneous Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: June 5, 2017

The electric field in the cortex during transcranial current stimulation.

Pedro Cavaleiro Miranda1, Abeye Mekonnen, Ricardo Salvador

  • 1Instituto de Biofísica e Engenharia Biomédica, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisbon, Portugal. pcmiranda@fc.ul.pt

Neuroimage
|January 1, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Transcranial current stimulation (tCS) electric fields in the cortex are shaped by intricate brain geometry and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) conductivity. This study reveals distinct field patterns, crucial for understanding tCS effects.

More Related Videos

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism
13:56

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism

Published on: November 19, 2014

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
12:00

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: May 23, 2011

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Simultaneous Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
10:25

Simultaneous Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Published on: June 5, 2017

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism
13:56

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy as a Tool for the Measurement of Bi-hemispheric Transcranial Electric Stimulation Effects on Primary Motor Cortex Metabolism

Published on: November 19, 2014

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
12:00

Electrode Positioning and Montage in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Published on: May 23, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biophysics
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Transcranial current stimulation (tCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique.
  • Accurate modeling of electric fields is essential for understanding tCS mechanisms.
  • Tissue heterogeneity and complex cortical geometry influence electric field distribution.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of tissue heterogeneity and cortical geometry on electric fields during tCS.
  • To analyze the distribution of electric fields within the cortex.
  • To evaluate the effect of electrode size on electric field focality.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a realistic head model from structural MRI data.
  • Accurately represented tissue interfaces, especially cortical surfaces.
  • Calculated electric field distribution using computational modeling.

Main Results:

  • Complex cortical geometry and high CSF conductivity create distinctive electric field patterns in the cortex.
  • A strong normal electric field component is observed at the bottom of sulci.
  • A weaker tangential component covers gyral areas, influenced by sulcal/gyral details.
  • Smaller electrodes improved tangential component focality but not the normal component's focality.

Conclusions:

  • Cortical geometry and CSF significantly shape tCS-induced electric fields.
  • Distinct normal and tangential field components have specific distributions.
  • Electrode size impacts focality differently for normal and tangential components.
  • Experimental validation is needed to confirm these findings and advance tCS understanding.