Minimal-access aortic valve replacement with concomitant aortic procedure: a 9-year experience

Tsuyoshi Kaneko1, Gregory S Couper, Wernard A A Borstlap

  • 1Department of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Insights

Upper hemisternotomy is a safe approach for aortic valve replacement (AVR) and aortic surgery. This minimal-access technique offers good early and midterm outcomes with low morbidity and short hospital stays.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Background:

  • Upper hemisternotomy is an established minimal-access technique for aortic valve replacement (AVR) and aortic surgery.
  • This approach has been utilized in our institution for various cardiac procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the outcomes of AVR combined with concomitant aortic surgery performed via an upper hemisternotomy approach.
  • To evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this surgical technique.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 109 patients undergoing AVR with concomitant aortic surgery through upper hemisternotomy between January 2002 and May 2011.
  • Procedures included AVR with ascending aortic replacement, AVR with ascending and proximal arch replacement, AVR with aortoplasty, Bentall procedure, and AVR with root enlargement.
  • In-hospital outcomes and 1- and 5-year survival rates were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • The study included diverse patient demographics and pathologies, with 41.3% having bicuspid aortic valve and 82.6% presenting with true aneurysm.
  • Operative mortality was low at 2.8% (3 patients), with minimal major complications such as reoperation for bleeding (3.7%), myocardial infarction (1.8%), and new-onset renal failure (1.8%).
  • Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated excellent 1-year (96.2%) and 5-year (92.4%) survival rates, with a mean length of stay of 7.1 days.

Conclusions:

  • The upper hemisternotomy approach is a safe and feasible option for AVR with concomitant aortic surgery.
  • This technique is associated with favorable early and midterm clinical outcomes.
  • The approach offers the benefits of low morbidity and a shorter hospital stay.
Abstract