Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Translational Rabbit Model of Chronic Cardiac Pacing
Published on: January 6, 2023
Permanent cardiac pacing in children: choosing the optimal pacing site: a multicenter study
Jan Janoušek1, Irene E van Geldorp, Sylvia Krupičková
1Children's Heart Center, University Hospital Motol, V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Prague 5, Czech Republic. jan.janousek@lfmotol.cuni.cz
Insights
The location of ventricular pacing significantly impacts left ventricular (LV) function and synchrony in children. Pacing the LV apex or midlateral wall offers the best outcomes for preserving cardiac pump function.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Cardiac Mechanics
Background:
- Children requiring permanent pacing often have atrioventricular block and structurally normal hearts.
- The impact of ventricular pacing site on left ventricular (LV) function and synchrony in pediatric populations is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate how different ventricular pacing sites affect LV synchrony and function in children.
- To identify optimal pacing sites for preserving cardiac pump function in pediatric patients requiring permanent pacing.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study of 178 children (<18 years) from 21 centers with permanent pacing.
- Analysis of pacing sites including right ventricular (RV) outflow tract, RV lateral wall, RV apex, RV septum, LV apex, LV midlateral wall, and LV base.
- Assessment of LV synchrony, pump function, and contraction efficiency in relation to pacing site.
Main Results:
- Pacing site significantly affected LV synchrony, pump function, and contraction efficiency.
- Pacing at the LV apex or LV midlateral wall demonstrated superior LV synchrony and function.
- Pacing from the RV outflow tract/lateral RV was associated with significantly decreased LV function (LV ejection fraction <45%).
- LV apex/LV midlateral wall pacing was linked to preserved LV function (LV ejection fraction ≥55%).
- LV dyssynchrony correlated inversely with LV ejection fraction (R=0.80, P=0.031).
Conclusions:
- The ventricular pacing site critically influences mechanical synchrony, efficiency, and pump function in children needing lifelong pacing.
- Pacing the LV apex or LV midlateral wall holds the greatest potential to prevent pacing-induced reductions in cardiac pump function.
- Optimizing pacing site selection is crucial for long-term cardiac health in pediatric patients.
Background:
We evaluated the effects of the site of ventricular pacing on left ventricular (LV) synchrony and function in children requiring permanent pacing.
Methods And Results:
One hundred seventy-eight children (aged <18 years) from 21 centers with atrioventricular block and a structurally normal heart undergoing permanent pacing were studied cross-sectionally. Median age at evaluation was 11.2 (interquartile range, 6.3-15.0) years. Median pacing duration was 5.4 (interquartile range, 3.1-8.8) years. Pacing sites were the free wall of the right ventricular (RV) outflow tract (n=8), lateral RV (n=44), RV apex (n=61), RV septum (n=29), LV apex (n=12), LV midlateral wall (n=17), and LV base (n=7). LV synchrony, pump function, and contraction efficiency were significantly affected by pacing site and were superior in children paced at the LV apex/LV midlateral wall. LV dyssynchrony correlated inversely with LV ejection fraction (R=0.80, P=0.031). Pacing from the RV outflow tract/lateral RV predicted significantly decreased LV function (LV ejection fraction <45%; odds ratio, 10.72; confidence interval, 2.07-55.60; P=0.005), whereas LV apex/LV midlateral wall pacing was associated with preserved LV function (LV ejection fraction ≥55%; odds ratio, 8.26; confidence interval, 1.46-47.62; P=0.018). Presence of maternal autoantibodies, gender, age at implantation, duration of pacing, DDD mode, and QRS duration had no significant impact on LV ejection fraction.
Conclusions:
The site of ventricular pacing has a major impact on LV mechanical synchrony, efficiency, and pump function in children who require lifelong pacing. Of the sites studied, LV apex/LV midlateral wall pacing has the greatest potential to prevent pacing-induced reduction of cardiac pump function.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...
Cardiac Catheterization II: Right Heart Catheterization

