Procedural pain in neonates in Australian hospitals: a survey update of practices

Jann Foster1, Kaye Spence, David Henderson-Smart

  • 1School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. j.foster@bigpond.net.au

Insights

Awareness and use of breastfeeding and sucrose for neonatal procedural pain management in Australia have increased since 2004. Continued support is needed for wider adoption of evidence-based pain relief in neonates.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal care
  • Pain management
  • Evidence-based practice

Background:

  • Procedural pain in neonates is a significant concern.
  • Previous surveys in 2004 indicated suboptimal uptake of evidence-based pain management strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the current uptake of evidence for managing procedural pain in neonates across Australia.
  • To evaluate the use of breastfeeding and sucrose for pain relief.

Main Methods:

  • An Australian-wide survey was conducted among eligible hospitals.
  • Data collected on the use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), pain assessment tools, breastfeeding, and sucrose for procedural pain management.

Main Results:

  • 39% of hospitals used a CPG for neonatal pain management, with higher use in intensive care units.
  • Only 11% of units used a pain assessment tool, but 50-80% in higher-level care units.
  • Awareness and use of breastfeeding (90% awareness, 78% use) and sucrose (79% awareness, 53% use) for procedural pain were reported.
  • 89% of units reported using either breastfeeding or sucrose for pain management.

Conclusions:

  • There has been an increase in the awareness and use of breastfeeding and sucrose for neonatal procedural pain since 2004.
  • Continued resources, local champions, and a national interest group are recommended to further promote evidence-based pain management in neonates.
Abstract