Eye-tracking as a Measure of Responsiveness to Joint Attention in Infants at Risk for Autism
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Eye Tracking Young Children with Autism
Published on: March 27, 2012
Insights
Eye-tracking assessments of reduced responsiveness to joint attention (RJA) are valid. This study confirmed eye-tracking RJA measures correlate with traditional ESCS assessments in infants at high autism risk.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Reduced responsiveness to joint attention (RJA) predicts language difficulties and autism.
- Eye-tracking offers precise, standardized measurement of RJA.
- Construct validity of eye-tracking RJA assessments requires empirical support.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the construct validity of eye-tracking RJA assessments.
- To compare eye-tracking RJA with traditional ESCS RJA measures.
- To examine RJA relations with language and autistic symptoms in high-risk infants.
Main Methods:
- Compared eye-tracking RJA with ESCS RJA in 18-month-old infant siblings of children with autism.
- Assessed concurrent language skills and autistic symptomatology.
- Analyzed correlations between RJA measures and developmental outcomes.
Main Results:
- Statistically significant correlations were found between ESCS RJA and eye-tracking RJA measures.
- Few significant relations were observed between RJA measures and concurrent language or autistic symptoms.
- The study established construct validity for eye-tracking RJA assessments.
Conclusions:
- Eye-tracking assessments of RJA demonstrate construct validity.
- Eye-tracking RJA is a reliable tool for assessing early social communication.
- Further research is needed to explore the predictive power of eye-tracking RJA for later outcomes.
Abstract:
Reduced responsiveness to joint attention (RJA), as assessed by the Early Social Communication Scales (ESCS), is predictive of both subsequent language difficulties and autism diagnosis. Eye-tracking measurement of RJA is a promising prognostic tool because it is highly precise and standardized. However, the construct validity of eye-tracking assessments of RJA has not been established. By comparing RJA in an eye-tracking paradigm to RJA during the ESCS, the current study evaluated the construct validity of an eye-tracking assessment of RJA for 18-month-old infant siblings of children with autism. Relations between measures of RJA and concurrent language skills and autistic symptomatology were assessed. Correlations between measures of ESCS RJA and eye-tracking RJA were statistically significant, but few relations between either ESCS or eye-tracking assessments of RJA and language or symptoms were observed. This study establishes the construct validity of eye-tracking assessments of RJA.
More Related Videos
05:32Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos
Published on: December 7, 2018
07:09Gaze in Action: Head-mounted Eye Tracking of Children's Dynamic Visual Attention During Naturalistic Behavior
Published on: November 14, 2018