Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

Introduction to the Human Microbiota

Introduction to the Human Microbiota

Microorganisms colonize various regions of the human body, including the mouth, nasal passages, throat, stomach, intestines, urogenital tract, and skin. The total number of microbial cells is estimated to range from 10¹³ to 10¹⁴—comparable to, or exceeding, the number of human somatic cells. This host–microbiome relationship has led to the conceptualization of humans as supraorganisms, wherein microbial communities perform vital roles in development, immunity, and disease...

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Clinical course and outcomes of antibody-mediated rejection after heart transplant in the contemporary era.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·2026

Same author

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy and cardiovascular outcomes in US Medicare beneficiaries.

European heart journal·2026

Same author

A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Applications for Diagnosis, Classification, and Prognosis in Lupus Nephritis.

Kidney360·2026

Same author

Regional Nasal Drug Deposition in Pediatric vs. Adult Models: In vitro Insights into User Technique and Breathing Patterns Sensitivity.

Pharmaceutical research·2026

Same author

Renal Cell Type and State Estimation in Brightfield Histology Images: A Pilot Study on Diabetic Nephropathy.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026

Same author

Explainable Feature Embeddings from Histopathology Foundation Models: A Case Study for End Stage Kidney Disease Risk Analysis in Diabetic Nephropathy Patients.

Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

Hypothesis testing and power calculations for taxonomic-based human microbiome data.

Patricio S La Rosa¹, J Paul Brooks, Elena Deych

¹Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.

|January 4, 2013

Summary

This study introduces novel biostatistical methods for microbiome data analysis using a fully parametric Dirichlet-multinomial model. This approach enhances statistical power and retains more data information compared to non-parametric methods.

More Related Videos

A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice

A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice

Published on: July 25, 2017

A Method to Define the Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Colon Microbiome Biodiversity in a Mouse Colon Tumor Model

A Method to Define the Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Colon Microbiome Biodiversity in a Mouse Colon Tumor Model

Published on: February 28, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice

A Method to Assess Bacteriocin Effects on the Gut Microbiota of Mice

Published on: July 25, 2017

A Method to Define the Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Colon Microbiome Biodiversity in a Mouse Colon Tumor Model

A Method to Define the Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Colon Microbiome Biodiversity in a Mouse Colon Tumor Model

Published on: February 28, 2018

Area of Science:

Microbiome research
Biostatistics
Computational biology

Background:

Microbiome data analysis presents unique statistical challenges.
Existing non-parametric methods may not fully utilize available data.
Accurate statistical modeling is crucial for microbiome research.

Purpose of the Study:

To present novel biostatistical methods for microbiome data analysis.
To introduce a fully parametric approach using the Dirichlet-multinomial distribution.
To enable robust statistical inference for microbiome studies.

Main Methods:

Development and application of a fully parametric Dirichlet-multinomial model.
Statistical approaches for hypothesis testing (e.g., group comparisons).
Power and sample size calculations for experimental design.

Main Results:

The parametric approach retains more information compared to non-parametric methods.
Demonstrated application to taxonomic and rank abundance distribution data.
Illustrative analysis using Human Microbiome Project (HMP) data.

Conclusions:

The Dirichlet-multinomial model offers a powerful framework for microbiome data analysis.
This parametric approach improves statistical power and data utilization.
Available software facilitates the implementation of these advanced statistical methods.