Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human-AI Collaboration in Healthcare: A Scoping Review.

NPJ digital medicine·2026
Same author

The Sound of Water: Inferring Physical Properties from Pouring Liquids.

IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence·2026
Same author

Identifying scoliosis in a population-based adult cohort: automation of a validated method based on total body dual energy X-ray absorptiometry scans.

European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society·2026
Same author

A visually grounded language model for fetal ultrasound understanding.

Nature biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

On the public dissemination and open sourcing of ultrasound resources, datasets and deep learning models.

NPJ digital medicine·2025
Same author

The human factor in explainable artificial intelligence: clinician variability in trust, reliance, and performance.

NPJ digital medicine·2025
Same journal

LiftReg: Limited Angle 2D/3D Deformable Registration.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
Same journal

Inverse Consistency by Construction for Multistep Deep Registration.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
Same journal

Can Crowdsourced Annotations Improve AI-based Congestion Scoring For Bedside Lung Ultrasound?

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
Same journal

Equivariant Filters for Efficient Tracking in 3D Imaging.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
Same journal

Lobar Lung Density Embeddings with a Transformer encoder (LobTe) to predict emphysema progression in COPD.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
Same journal

uniGradICON: A Foundation Model for Medical Image Registration.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures
07:05

Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures

Published on: February 15, 2022

Learning to detect cells using non-overlapping extremal regions.

Carlos Arteta1, Victor Lempitsky, J Alison Noble

  • 1Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, UK.

Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention
|January 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a machine learning method for automated cell detection in microscopy images. The approach achieves state-of-the-art accuracy across various imaging types, aiding cell-based experiment automation.

More Related Videos

Automated Detection and Analysis of Exocytosis
13:28

Automated Detection and Analysis of Exocytosis

Published on: September 11, 2021

A Live-cell Image-Based Machine Learning Strategy to Monitor Pluripotent Stem Cell Differentiation
11:38

A Live-cell Image-Based Machine Learning Strategy to Monitor Pluripotent Stem Cell Differentiation

Published on: October 4, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures
07:05

Area-based Image Analysis Algorithm for Quantification of Macrophage-fibroblast Cocultures

Published on: February 15, 2022

Automated Detection and Analysis of Exocytosis
13:28

Automated Detection and Analysis of Exocytosis

Published on: September 11, 2021

A Live-cell Image-Based Machine Learning Strategy to Monitor Pluripotent Stem Cell Differentiation
11:38

A Live-cell Image-Based Machine Learning Strategy to Monitor Pluripotent Stem Cell Differentiation

Published on: October 4, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Computational biology
  • Image analysis
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Automating cell-based experiments requires accurate cell detection in microscopy.
  • Existing methods may lack versatility across different imaging modalities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a machine learning-based cell detection method adaptable to diverse microscopy image types.
  • To improve the automation of cell-based experiments through enhanced cell detection.

Main Methods:

  • A three-step process involving candidate region identification, statistical appearance modeling, and dynamic programming for non-overlapping region selection.
  • Training a cell model using limited, simply annotated images within a structured Support Vector Machine (SVM) framework.

Main Results:

  • Achieved state-of-the-art cell detection accuracy.
  • Demonstrated applicability across Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained histology, fluorescence, and phase-contrast microscopy images.
  • The method requires minimal annotated data for training.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed machine learning method offers a robust and versatile solution for automated cell detection.
  • This technique enhances the automation of cell-based experiments by providing accurate detection across multiple imaging modalities.