Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
Published on: April 14, 2023
Evaluating segmentation error without ground truth
Timo Kohlberger1, Vivek Singh, Chris Alvino
1Imaging and Computer Vision, Siemens Corp., Corporate Research and Technology, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Abstract:
The automatic delineation of the boundaries of organs and other anatomical structures is a key component of many medical image processing systems. In this paper we present a generic learning approach based on a novel space of segmentation features, which can be trained to predict the overlap error and Dice coefficient of an arbitrary organ segmentation without knowing the ground truth delineation. We show the regressor to be much stronger a predictor of these error metrics than the responses of probabilistic boosting classifiers trained on the segmentation boundary. The presented approach not only allows us to build reliable confidence measures and fidelity checks, but also to rank several segmentation hypotheses against each other during online usage of the segmentation algorithm in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Margin of Error
Errors in Taping

