Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
Errors and Mistakes in Surveying01:19

Errors and Mistakes in Surveying

Errors and mistakes in surveying refer to inaccuracies in measurements and data recording. The errors are deviations from the actual value caused by human sensory limitations, equipment flaws, or environmental effects. These errors are typically unintentional and can result from the inherent imperfections in the instruments used, atmospheric conditions, or the observer’s inability to perceive exact measurements. On the other hand, mistakes are caused by the surveyor's lack of attention,...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization01:12

Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization

Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
Errors in Taping01:18

Errors in Taping

Errors in taping arise from multiple factors that can significantly impact measurement accuracy in surveying. Misalignment of the tape, often due to human error, is one primary source. A skilled rear tapeman, using a telescope, can help correct alignment by guiding the head tapeman; however, human limitations still lead to small inaccuracies. These errors may include misplacement of pins or inaccurate tape readings due to common visual confusions, such as mistaking a six for a nine. Such...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Triaging mammography with artificial intelligence: an implementation study.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2025
Same author

Structural basis of LRPPRC-SLIRP-dependent translation by the mitoribosome.

Nature structural & molecular biology·2024
Same author

Musculocontractural type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome with novel CHST14 pathogenic variant in two siblings.

Pediatric dermatology·2024
Same author

The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making.

PNAS nexus·2024
Same author

Targeting HIF-1α in sickle cell disease and cancer: unraveling therapeutic opportunities and risks.

Expert opinion on therapeutic targets·2024
Same author

Risk factors and clinical presentation of rhino-orbital mucormycosis: Lesson learnt during Covid pandemic.

Journal of family medicine and primary care·2024
Same journal

LiftReg: Limited Angle 2D/3D Deformable Registration.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
Same journal

Inverse Consistency by Construction for Multistep Deep Registration.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
Same journal

Can Crowdsourced Annotations Improve AI-based Congestion Scoring For Bedside Lung Ultrasound?

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
Same journal

Equivariant Filters for Efficient Tracking in 3D Imaging.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
Same journal

Lobar Lung Density Embeddings with a Transformer encoder (LobTe) to predict emphysema progression in COPD.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
Same journal

uniGradICON: A Foundation Model for Medical Image Registration.

Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
05:56

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application

Published on: April 14, 2023

Evaluating segmentation error without ground truth.

Timo Kohlberger1, Vivek Singh, Chris Alvino

  • 1Imaging and Computer Vision, Siemens Corp., Corporate Research and Technology, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention
|January 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel learning method for medical image segmentation, accurately predicting segmentation quality without ground truth data. This approach enhances confidence and reliability in clinical applications.

More Related Videos

Manual Segmentation of the Human Choroid Plexus Using Brain MRI
04:25

Manual Segmentation of the Human Choroid Plexus Using Brain MRI

Published on: December 15, 2023

Automated Analysis of C. elegans Fluorescence Images using SegElegans
06:27

Automated Analysis of C. elegans Fluorescence Images using SegElegans

Published on: October 10, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application
05:56

Objectification of Tongue Diagnosis in Traditional Medicine, Data Analysis, and Study Application

Published on: April 14, 2023

Manual Segmentation of the Human Choroid Plexus Using Brain MRI
04:25

Manual Segmentation of the Human Choroid Plexus Using Brain MRI

Published on: December 15, 2023

Automated Analysis of C. elegans Fluorescence Images using SegElegans
06:27

Automated Analysis of C. elegans Fluorescence Images using SegElegans

Published on: October 10, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Medical Image Analysis
  • Computer-Aided Diagnosis
  • Computational Anatomy

Background:

  • Automatic organ delineation is crucial for medical image processing.
  • Accurate segmentation quality assessment is challenging without ground truth.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a generic learning approach for predicting segmentation error metrics.
  • To enable reliable confidence measures and fidelity checks for organ segmentation.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a novel feature space for segmentation.
  • Trained a regressor to predict overlap error and Dice coefficient.
  • Compared regressor performance against probabilistic boosting classifiers.

Main Results:

  • The novel regressor significantly outperformed traditional methods in predicting segmentation error.
  • The approach allows for ranking of multiple segmentation hypotheses.
  • Demonstrated the capability to assess segmentation quality without ground truth.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed learning approach provides reliable confidence measures for organ segmentation.
  • This method improves the fidelity and clinical utility of automated segmentation algorithms.
  • Enables robust online assessment and selection of segmentation results.