Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...
Hazard Rate01:11

Hazard Rate

The hazard rate, also known as the hazard function or failure rate, is a statistical measure used to describe the instantaneous rate at which an event occurs, given that the event has not yet happened. From a probabilistic perspective, it represents the likelihood that a subject will experience the event in a very small time interval, conditional on surviving up to the beginning of that interval. In terms of frequency, the hazard rate can be viewed as the ratio of the number of events to the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Non-medical opioid (NMO) use in Canadian adolescents: Trends, risk factors, and regional variations.

Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·2026
Same author

Investigating changes in vape use among Canadian youth from 2014 to 2022.

Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique·2025
Same author

Prevalence of Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders Among Adolescents Experiencing Homelessness: A Systematic Review.

Community mental health journal·2025
Same author

Retrospective evaluation of Postnatal Growth and Retinopathy of Prematurity (G-ROP) and Colorado Retinopathy of Prematurity (CO-ROP) screening algorithms in University of Pittsburgh Medical Centers cohort.

Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus·2023
Same author

Effect of synbiotics on weight loss and metabolic health in adults with overweight and obesity: A randomized controlled trial.

Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)·2023
Same author

Simulation-Based Mock-Up Evaluation of a Universal Operating Room.

HERD·2019

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

A comparison of static and dynamic hazard perception tests.

Charles T Scialfa1, David Borkenhagen, John Lyon

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada. scialfa@ucalgary.ca

Accident; Analysis and Prevention
|January 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary

This study compared dynamic and static hazard perception tests (HPTs) for young drivers. While both HPTs reliably assessed driving behavior, neither predicted real-world collisions or violations.

More Related Videos

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
12:23

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects
11:12

Driving Simulation in the Clinic: Testing Visual Exploratory Behavior in Daily Life Activities in Patients with Visual Field Defects

Published on: September 18, 2012

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients
12:23

Dynamic Visual Tests to Identify and Quantify Visual Damage and Repair Following Demyelination in Optic Neuritis Patients

Published on: April 14, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Traffic safety research
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Driver behavior analysis

Background:

  • Hazard perception is crucial for safe driving.
  • Hazard Perception Tests (HPTs) are increasingly used for driver training, assessment, and licensing.
  • Comparing dynamic (video) and static (still image) HPTs is important for understanding their effectiveness.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the reliability and predictive validity of dynamic and static Hazard Perception Tests (HPTs).
  • To investigate the relationship between HPT performance, reaction time, and self-reported driving errors.
  • To determine if HPTs can predict real-world driving outcomes like collisions and violations.

Main Methods:

  • Fifty-six young adult drivers completed both dynamic and static HPTs.
  • Participants also completed the Driver Behavior Questionnaire and a simple reaction time test.
  • Self-reported data on collisions and moving violations were collected.

Main Results:

  • Both static and dynamic HPTs demonstrated good reliability.
  • A moderate correlation (.40) was found between static and dynamic HPT scores, reduced when controlling for reaction time (.25).
  • Both HPTs predicted lapses and errors on the Driver Behavior Questionnaire but did not predict self-reported collisions or violations.

Conclusions:

  • Dynamic and static HPTs are reliable measures of hazard perception.
  • The predictive validity of HPTs for real-world driving outcomes remains limited.
  • Differences in visual cues between dynamic and static scenes may influence hazard detection and decision-making.