Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this information.
Statistical Significance01:37

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Valence Effects on Episodic Memory in Young and Old Adults Following Exposure to Emotional Stimuli.

The European journal of neuroscience·2025
Same author

The Impact of Ageing on Episodic Memory Retrieval: How Valence Influences Neural Functional Connectivity.

NeuroSci·2024
Same author

The effect of negative arousal on declarative memory.

Neuropsychologia·2023
Same author

Topographical Distribution of Neuroanatomical Abnormalities Following COVID-19 Invasion : A Systematic Literature Review.

Clinical neuroradiology·2023
Same author

The effects of age bias on neural correlates of successful and unsuccessful response inhibition in younger and older adults.

Neurobiology of aging·2023
Same author

Spikes with and without concurrent high-frequency oscillations: Topographic relationship and neural correlates using EEG-fMRI.

Epilepsy research·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges
07:18

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges

Published on: January 26, 2024

Individual differences in the gesture effect on working memory.

Lars Marstaller1, Hana Burianová

  • 1Department of Cognitive Science & ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie University Sydney, Sydney, Australia. lars.marstaller@mq.edu.au

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|January 5, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity affect how co-speech gestures influence cognitive performance. Low WM capacity individuals showed reduced accuracy when not gesturing, unlike high-capacity individuals.

More Related Videos

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges
07:18

Examining Gesture Production in the Presence of Communication Challenges

Published on: January 26, 2024

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Communication

Background:

  • Co-speech gestures are known to interact with working memory (WM).
  • Previous research has not explored individual differences in this gesture-WM interaction.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for a comprehensive view of gesture's cognitive role.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate individual differences in the effect of co-speech gestures on working memory (WM) capacity.
  • To determine if WM capacity modulates the relationship between gesturing and memory performance.
  • To explore the impact of gesture presence on WM accuracy across varying WM loads.

Main Methods:

  • A novel task differentiating between gesturing and non-gesturing conditions was employed.
  • An operation span task was used to measure individual working memory capacity.
  • WM accuracy was compared between participants with high and low WM capacities under both gesture conditions.

Main Results:

  • Significant individual differences were observed in the effect of gestures on WM.
  • Individuals with low WM capacity exhibited decreased WM accuracy in the absence of gestures.
  • This accuracy reduction was not observed in low WM individuals who gestured, nor in any high WM individuals.

Conclusions:

  • The interaction between co-speech gestures and working memory is contingent upon an individual's WM load.
  • Gesture's cognitive benefits may be more pronounced for individuals with lower working memory capacities.
  • These findings highlight the importance of considering individual cognitive differences in gesture research.