Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of A-scan device accuracy.

U Giers1, C Epple

  • 1University Eye Hospital, Ulm, West Germany.

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|March 1, 1990
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recommendations for the emergency management of complications associated with the new direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2013
Same author

Bicyclo[3.2.1]-DNA, a new DNA analog with a rigid backbone and flexibly linked bases: pairing properties with complementary DNA.

Chemistry & biology·1998
Same author

[Oculopression tonometry after argon laser trabeculoplasty].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·1992
Same author

[Iris fluorescence angiography findings in oculo-oscillodynamography].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·1991
Same author

[Changes in postoperative corneal astigmatism after laser dissection of corneo-scleral sutures].

Ophthalmologica. Journal international d'ophtalmologie. International journal of ophthalmology. Zeitschrift fur Augenheilkunde·1991
Same author

[The reliability of ultrasound biometry].

Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde·1990

Comparing A-scan biometry devices for intraocular lens power prediction, this study found the immersion technique most reproducible for axial length, especially in cataract patients. Other methods showed variations and decreased reliability for shorter eye segment measurements.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • A-scan biometry is crucial for intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.
  • Accurate axial length measurement is key to successful refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
  • Variations in biometry device performance can impact IOL power prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy and reproducibility of three A-scan biometry devices.
  • To evaluate the influence of different measurement techniques (immersion, applanation, modified applanation) on axial length measurements.
  • To assess retest reliability for various ocular segments and conditions, including cataractous lenses.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of three A-scan biometry devices in 159 individuals with repeated measurements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized immersion, applanation, and modified applanation techniques for axial length measurement.
  • Analyzed measurement distributions, retest reliability, and reproducibility for axial length, lens thickness, and anterior chamber depth.
  • Main Results:

    • The immersion technique provided the most reproducible axial length measurements, averaging 23.77 mm.
    • Applanation and modified applanation techniques resulted in shorter axial length readings (0.1 mm and 0.3 mm less, respectively).
    • Measurement reliability decreased for short anterior segment distances and lens thickness in cataractous lenses, though anterior chamber depth was more reliable in these patients.

    Conclusions:

    • The immersion technique is recommended for reproducible axial length measurement in A-scan biometry, particularly for cataract patients.
    • Variations in measurement techniques and ocular conditions affect the accuracy and reliability of biometry data.
    • Understanding device-specific performance is essential for optimizing IOL power calculations and surgical outcomes.