Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:

Investigation of Disease Outbreaks

Investigation of Disease Outbreaks

Multistate foodborne outbreaks pose significant public health risks and require meticulous investigation to identify sources and implement control measures. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) utilizes a dynamic seven-step process for these investigations, integrating data from laboratories, interviews, and environmental assessments to protect public health.Outbreak Detection: The detection of multistate outbreaks typically begins with PulseNet, the CDC's national laboratory...

Introduction to Epidemiology

Introduction to Epidemiology

Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...

Cause and Effect

Cause and Effect

While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Hantavirus outbreak should reset WHO's default approach to airborne risk.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2026

Same author

Corrigendum to 'Advances in the Basic Sciences in Thoracic Oncology in the Last 20 Years and Their Translational Impact' [Journal of Thoracic Oncology Volume 21 Issue 1 (2026) 41-76].

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer·2026

Same author

Lung cancer screening: are race- and risk-aware criteria needed?

Journal of the National Cancer Institute·2026

Same author

Advances in the Basic Sciences in Thoracic Oncology in the Last 20 Years and Their Translational Impact.

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer·2026

Same author

Reflections from a departing editor-in-chief.

Population health metrics·2025

Same author

Uranium mining and lung cancer: a legacy of the nuclear age.

Carcinogenesis·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Causal inference in public health.

Thomas A Glass¹, Steven N Goodman, Miguel A Hernán

¹Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. tglass@jhsph.edu

Annual Review of Public Health

|January 10, 2013

Summary

Causal inference in public health is shifting towards an intervention-focused framework. This approach better estimates the consequences of actions, improving public health decision-making and addressing global challenges.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Area of Science:

Public Health
Epidemiology
Biostatistics

Background:

Causal inference is crucial for public health interventions.
Traditional guidelines for causal association are being re-evaluated.
The potential outcomes framework offers a new perspective.

Purpose of the Study:

To review and contrast traditional causal inference guidelines with the potential outcomes framework.
To argue for the suitability of the potential outcomes framework in public health.
To highlight the importance of modern statistical methods in causal analysis.

Main Methods:

Review of existing guidelines for causal inference.
Comparison with the potential outcomes framework.
Discussion of modern statistical approaches to causal inference.

Main Results:

The potential outcomes framework is more suitable for public health, estimating intervention consequences.
This framework provides a more precise measure than traditional causal effect notions.
Modern statistical methods increasingly adopt this intervention-centric approach.

Conclusions:

The potential outcomes framework enhances causal inference for public health interventions.
Acknowledging complex causal structures and collecting appropriate data are essential.
Newer causal inference methods are vital for addressing complex global public health issues.