Effects of the left ventricular assist device on right ventricular function

Right ventricular failure is a leading cause of death in patients who require the left ventricular assist device. Previous reports suggested right ventricular functional deterioration during left ventricular assist but lacked a method by which right ventricular function could be quantified adequately. This study examined the effects of left ventricular volume unloading on right ventricular systolic function by means of the stroke work/end-diastolic volume relationship, a load-insensitive index of myocardial performance. In 12 anesthetized open-chested dogs, right ventricular and left ventricular pressures were measured with micromanometers while ultrasonic dimension transducers measured left and right ventricular orthogonal diameters. Left ventricular unloading was accomplished with left atrial-to-femoral artery bypass with a centrifugal pump. Data were recorded during transient vena caval occlusion in the control state and with maximal left ventricular unloading by full support by the left ventricular assist device. Modified ellipsoidal geometry was used to calculate simultaneous biventricular volumes, and linear regression analysis of right ventricular stroke work versus end-diastolic volume was used to quantify right ventricular systolic function. Average slope and x intercept of this relationship under control conditions were 2.2 +/- 0.3 X 10(4) erg/ml and 10.7 +/- 5.0 ml, respectively. During full support by the left ventricular assist device (mean flow rate, 2.4 +/- 0.3 L/min), left ventricular end-diastolic volume decreased by 31% (p less than 0.01), left ventricular septal-free wall diameter decreased by 7% (p less than 0.001), and rate of rise of right ventricular peak positive pressure declined by 13% (p less than 0.05). The corresponding slope and x intercept of the right ventricular stroke work/end-diastolic volume relationship during full unloading of left ventricular assist device were 2.3 +/- 0.3 X 0.3 X 10(4) erg/ml and 14.3 +/- 4.8 ml, respectively; these values were not significantly different from control values (p greater than 0.5). Additionally, analysis of right ventricular end-diastolic pressure-volume relationships suggested improved right ventricular chamber compliance, although the effects were small and did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.10). These data imply that marked alterations in biventricular geometry accompanying left ventricular volume unloading by the left ventricular assist device in a normal heart do not significantly alter right ventricular performance characteristics.