Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Heritability of the olfactory bulb and its associated brain network.

NeuroImage·2026
Same author

Olfactory bulb-cortex oscillations encode perceived odor intensity rather than concentration.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Impact of Electron Beam (eBeam) Treatment on Meat Quality and Sensory Attributes of Ground Chicken and Turkey.

Poultry science·2026
Same author

Evaluating the Color of Chocolate Chip Cookies: Comparative Performance of Instrumental Colorimetry, Digital Image Analysis, and Computer Vision Relative to Human Perception.

Journal of food science·2026
Same author

Electrophysiological correlates of detection and identification awareness for digits and letters.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same author

Methodological determinants of signal quality in electrobulbogram recordings.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 15, 2026

Combining a Breath-Synchronized Olfactometer with Brain Simulation to Study the Impact of Odors on Corticospinal Excitability and Effective Connectivity
06:13

Combining a Breath-Synchronized Olfactometer with Brain Simulation to Study the Impact of Odors on Corticospinal Excitability and Effective Connectivity

Published on: January 19, 2024

A spatiotemporal comparison between olfactory and trigeminal event-related potentials.

Emilia Iannilli1, Stefan Wiens, Artin Arshamian

  • 1Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Dresden Medical School, Fetscherstrasse 74, Dresden, Germany. Emilia.Iannilli@uniklinikum-dresdem.de

Neuroimage
|January 10, 2013
PubMed
Summary

Human olfactory and trigeminal processing differ in early brain responses. Olfactory (H2S) and trigeminal (CO2) stimuli activate distinct brain areas initially, showing similarities later on.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Long-term Recordings at Two Neuronal Processing Stages in Behaving Honeybees
13:55

Simultaneous Long-term Recordings at Two Neuronal Processing Stages in Behaving Honeybees

Published on: July 21, 2014

Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation
06:56

Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation

Published on: December 18, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 15, 2026

Combining a Breath-Synchronized Olfactometer with Brain Simulation to Study the Impact of Odors on Corticospinal Excitability and Effective Connectivity
06:13

Combining a Breath-Synchronized Olfactometer with Brain Simulation to Study the Impact of Odors on Corticospinal Excitability and Effective Connectivity

Published on: January 19, 2024

Simultaneous Long-term Recordings at Two Neuronal Processing Stages in Behaving Honeybees
13:55

Simultaneous Long-term Recordings at Two Neuronal Processing Stages in Behaving Honeybees

Published on: July 21, 2014

Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation
06:56

Somatosensory Event-related Potentials from Orofacial Skin Stretch Stimulation

Published on: December 18, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Processing
  • Olfaction and Trigeminal Systems

Background:

  • Understanding the distinct neural pathways for olfactory and trigeminal stimuli is crucial for sensory science.
  • Previous research has often studied these systems separately, limiting comparative insights.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the temporal and spatial brain processing of human olfactory and trigeminal stimuli.
  • To identify early and late differences and similarities in neural activation patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a selective olfactory stimulus (hydrogen sulfide, H2S) and a trigeminal stimulus (carbon dioxide, CO2) in healthy volunteers.
  • Employed classical electroencephalography (EEG) analysis with event-related potentials (ERPs) and advanced source localization techniques.
  • Applied microstate segmentation and statistical parametrical mapping for detailed analysis.

Main Results:

  • Identified 5 distinct brain microstate maps characterizing olfactory and trigeminal processing.
  • Observed significant differences in neural responses within the first 300ms, with olfactory stimuli engaging olfactory areas and trigeminal stimuli activating somatosensory/noxious areas.
  • Found similarities between the two processing types after 300ms.
  • CO2 stimulation showed greater activation in a motor/sniffing network, while H2S stimulation led to increased activation in the ipsilateral primary olfactory cortex.

Conclusions:

  • Human olfactory and trigeminal systems exhibit distinct early neural processing timelines and spatial brain involvements.
  • Later processing stages reveal convergence between these sensory modalities.
  • The findings provide novel insights into the neurobiological underpinnings of smell and chemesthesis.