Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
The IIP examination: an analysis of group performance 2009-2011
1The American Registry of Radiologic Technologists, 1255 Northland Drive, St. Paul, MN, 55120, USA. ben.babcock@arrt.org
Abstract:
This report summarizes the performance of the Imaging Informatics Professional (IIP) examination from 2009 to 2011 (six exam administrations). Results show that the IIP exam is a reliable measuring instrument that is functioning well to consistently classify candidates as passing or failing. An analysis of the section scores revealed that content in the Image Management, Systems Management, and Clinical Engineering sections of the exam were somewhat more difficult than the content in the other sections. The authors discuss how future candidates may use this information to help hone their study strategies. By all indications, the IIP examination appears to be statistically functioning as a high-quality certification measuring instrument.
Related Concept Videos
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Impact of Groups on Individuals
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Impact of Groups on Groups
Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS): Interferences
Interpersonal Psychotherapy