Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 15, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Oral anticoagulation therapy in heart failure patients in sinus rhythm: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Giuseppe Rengo1, Gennaro Pagano, Alessandro Squizzato
1Division of Cardiology, Salvatore Maugeri Foundation, IRCCS - Scientific Institute of Telese Terme, Benevento, Italy. giuseppe.rengo@unina.it
Insights
Oral anticoagulant therapies (OATs) do not improve outcomes for heart failure (HF) patients in sinus rhythm compared to antiplatelet drugs. While OATs reduce stroke risk, they increase major bleeding events, suggesting tailored treatment based on individual patient risk factors.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) is associated with high rates of morbidity, mortality, malignant arrhythmia, and thromboembolism.
- Anticoagulation is established for HF patients with atrial fibrillation but its role in HF patients with sinus rhythm remains debated.
- Understanding antithrombotic therapy benefits in HF patients with sinus rhythm is crucial for optimizing patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral anticoagulant therapies (OATs) with antiplatelet treatment in HF patients with sinus rhythm.
- To assess the efficacy and safety of OATs versus antiplatelet therapy in preventing cardioembolic events and mortality.
- To evaluate the risk-benefit profile of OATs in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- Searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and Scopus databases up to May 2012.
- Included 4 RCTs with a total of 3663 patients (ischemic and non-ischemic HF) in sinus rhythm.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in mortality was observed between OATs and antiplatelet treatment (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.86-1.19).
- OATs significantly reduced the risk of ischemic stroke (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32-0.74).
- OATs significantly increased the risk of major bleeding events (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.40-2.88) compared to antiplatelet therapy.
Conclusions:
- Oral anticoagulant therapies (OATs) do not offer a superior risk-benefit profile compared to antiplatelet treatment for cardioembolism prevention in HF patients with sinus rhythm.
- Warfarin and aspirin demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing mortality.
- Warfarin is more effective in preventing ischemic stroke but carries a higher risk of major bleeding; aspirin may be preferred for patients with high bleeding risk, while warfarin suits those with high thromboembolic risk.
Background:
Heart failure (HF) patients show high morbidity and mortality rate with increased risk of malignant arrhythmia and thromboembolism. Anticoagulation reduces embolic event and death rates in HF patients with atrial fibrillation, but if antithrombotic therapy is beneficial in patients with HF in sinus rhythm is still debated.
Methodology And Principal Findings:
We conducted a systematic review of prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulant therapies (OATs) compared to antiplatelet treatment in HF patients in sinus rhythm. MEDLINE, Web of Science, CENTRAL and Scopus databases were searched up to May 2012. Four RCTs were identified and a total of 3663 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Patients with both ischemic and non-ischemic HF were included. There was no significant difference in mortality (odds ratio (OR) 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86 to 1.19) between OATs group and antiplatelet drug group. OATs have reduced ischemic stroke risk (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.74), but have increased major bleeding risk (OR 2.01, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.88) compared to antiplatelet treatment.
Conclusion:
In HF patients in sinus rhythm OATs do not show a better risk-benefit profile compared to antiplatelet treatment in cardioembolism prevention. Warfarin and aspirin seem to be similar in reducing mortality. Warfarin reduces the incidence of ischemic stroke, but increases major bleedings. Thus, it is possible to speculate that aspirin prescription be indicated in patients with high risk of bleeding, whereas warfarin could be preferred in patients with high thromboembolic risk.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
