Clinical outcome of patients in a start-up congenital heart surgery program in Turkey

Ismihan Selen Onan1, Ersin Erek, Sertac Haydin

  • 1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Education and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Artificial Organs
|January 12, 2013
PubMed

Insights

This study evaluated a new congenital heart surgery program, reporting a 10.7% mortality rate. Effective teamwork and collaboration are crucial for achieving good clinical outcomes in pediatric cardiac surgery.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Cardiac Surgery
  • Congenital Heart Disease Outcomes
  • Surgical Program Development

Background:

  • Establishing a new congenital heart surgery program requires careful evaluation of early clinical outcomes.
  • Turkey's start-up program performed 616 operations between December 2009 and February 2012.
  • Patient demographics included newborns, infants, and children/adolescents.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize and analyze the clinical outcomes of a newly established congenital heart surgery program.
  • To assess the program's performance using risk adjustment in congenital heart surgery (RACHS-1) categories.
  • To identify factors influencing mortality rates in pediatric cardiac surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 616 congenital heart surgeries.
  • Utilized the Risk Adjustment in Congenital Heart Surgery (RACHS-1) model for risk stratification.
  • Compared mortality rates across different age groups and procedure types.

Main Results:

  • Overall mortality was 10.7% (66 out of 616 cases).
  • Mortality rates varied significantly by RACHS-1 category, from 0% in Level I to 78.5% in Levels V and VI.
  • Higher mortality was observed in neonates versus infants, infants versus children/adolescents, and palliative versus corrective procedures.

Conclusions:

  • A start-up congenital heart surgery program can achieve acceptable results with strong teamwork and collaboration.
  • Multidisciplinary collaboration among surgeons, anesthesiologists, cardiologists, perfusionists, and intensivists is vital for optimal outcomes.
  • Risk stratification using models like RACHS-1 is essential for evaluating program performance and identifying areas for improvement.

Related Concept Videos